Bannon: “You Guys Are Gonna Be Investigated And You’re Gonna Get Crushed”

Bannon and Julie Kelly provided an intense analysis of recent developments regarding Donald Trump’s legal challenges and the broader implications for political power and justice in the U.S. Here’s a summary:

Dismissal of Charges Against Trump: Both commentators framed the dismissal of the January 6th-related charges as a major victory for Trump and his populist movement. They criticized the prosecution’s approach as overreach, predicting significant repercussions for the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI officials involved in the investigations.

Executive Power and Pardons: Bannon and Kelly highlighted the potential for Trump to exercise unprecedented executive power if re-elected, including possibly pardoning himself or targeting perceived political adversaries. They argued that such actions, while controversial, could be framed as restoring justice against a “weaponized” legal system.

Consequences for DOJ and FBI Officials: The discussion emphasized a belief that career DOJ and FBI employees might face scrutiny or retaliation under a future Trump administration. They likened this to a breaking of institutional norms, with potential legal and political fallout.

Criticism of DOJ Tactics: Bannon accused DOJ officials of being complicit in a political vendetta against Trump. Drawing provocative historical comparisons, he dismissed their defense as merely “following orders” and likened it to defenses used during the Nuremberg Trials—a deeply contentious claim.

Julie Kelly’s Reflections: Kelly expressed relief over the case’s dismissal, seeing it as vindication for Trump and his supporters. However, she warned against complacency, predicting calls for Republicans to “move on” and emphasizing that the fight for accountability was just beginning.

Trump’s Planned Response: Both commentators speculated that Trump would pursue investigations into the 2020 election and potentially use the DOJ to investigate those who targeted him. This was framed as a means to expose corruption and strengthen the populist agenda.

Media and Political Critique: Bannon lambasted media narratives and establishment figures for what he described as biased attacks on Trump and his movement. He argued that these efforts had failed and signaled a broader reckoning for Trump’s opponents.

Part One:

Julie Kelly: “Even If Trump Lost, This Case Wouldn’t Of Survived Another Immunity Test By SCOTUS”

Part Two:

Mike Davis: “Nobody Is Above The Law, Lawyer Up Guys”

Steve Bannon, Julie Kelly, and Mike Davis discussed their critiques of the judicial system, particularly its treatment of January 6 defendants and President Trump. Bannon emphasized the monumental challenge Trump faced, lacking institutional support while confronting what he called a “corrupt” legal apparatus. He praised Kelly, a journalist, for exposing alleged injustices in January 6 cases and Davis for advocating judicial accountability through the Article III Project.

The discussion highlighted concerns about judicial overreach, including alleged partisan actions by judges like Tanya Chutkan and Arthur Engoron. Bannon accused these judges of violating constitutional norms, such as imposing gag orders and disregarding executive privilege. He and Davis argued that such actions undermined justice, calling for investigations into judges under federal conspiracy statutes. They also cited examples like the prosecution of Trump and alleged targeting of political opponents as part of broader lawfare by entrenched interests.

Kelly expressed gratitude for Bannon’s platform in amplifying her work and emphasized the need for Republicans to confront judicial and prosecutorial misconduct. Davis advocated for accountability through Justice Department mechanisms, Congressional oversight, and potentially a special counsel, given the unprecedented scale of alleged judicial corruption.

The trio framed their efforts as defending American values against systemic corruption, vowing to pursue justice for those they believe were wronged. They called for grassroots action and institutional reforms to prevent future abuses of power.

Boris Epshteyn: “It’s A Huge Day For President Trump, MAGA, And The American People”

In a spirited discussion, Steve Bannon and Boris Epshteyn hailed a historic moment in American politics, crediting Donald Trump’s resilience and the unwavering support of his followers. They emphasized Trump’s determination to fight against overwhelming legal and institutional opposition since leaving the White House in 2021. Epshteyn, described as an architect of Trump’s legal strategies, highlighted the relentless efforts of Trump’s legal team in countering numerous lawsuits and investigations across multiple jurisdictions, attributing their success to strategic decision-making and teamwork.

The conversation celebrated the perceived triumph of Trump’s vision, with Epshteyn reflecting on the challenges faced, including resistance from media, progressive organizations, and limited legal resources due to external pressures. Both Bannon and Epshteyn stressed that this victory is a testament to Trump’s moral and physical courage, and the unwavering support of his base.

Bannon concluded by emphasizing that this is not about retribution but about reform, focusing on ending weaponization of the legal system, securing borders, addressing crime, and restoring respect for the United States. They called for rooting out systemic corruption and ensuring accountability, framing the moment as pivotal for Trump’s return to the presidency and the future of American governance.

Sheriff Mack On Deportations: “They Will Be Much More Successful If Sheriff’s Are Participating”

Steve Bannon and Sheriff Mack discussed the critical role of sheriffs in enforcing immigration policies and President Trump’s agenda, emphasizing the necessity of sheriffs collaborating nationwide for successful deportation efforts. Sheriff Mack highlighted that sheriffs, as chief law enforcement officers (CLEOs), have countywide authority that supersedes mayors, particularly in addressing sanctuary cities. He argued that sanctuary policies aid and abet criminal activities, including cartels and unvetted individuals, which contradicts American sovereignty.

Sheriff Mack referenced a landmark 1997 Supreme Court case affirming sheriffs’ authority over federal mandates. He stated that sheriffs are uniquely positioned to lead deportation efforts effectively and humanely, leveraging their local knowledge and facilities. Mack suggested deploying military resources to secure the border while sheriffs manage enforcement and detention locally.

Bannon and Mack agreed that the Biden administration’s policies exacerbated the immigration crisis, emphasizing a humane yet firm approach to resolving it. They advocated sheriffs as the frontline solution over military bases, citing existing infrastructure and local expertise. Sheriff Mack invited citizens to support the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association (CSPOA) to promote accountability and collaboration in restoring law and order. Both praised figures like Sheriff Mark Lamb and Cash Patel for leadership roles in safeguarding national security.

Dr. Robert Malone Breaks Down If The NIH Should Be On The Chopping Block

Dr. Robert Malone and Steve Bannon discussed key issues surrounding the transition process as the U.S. approaches Thanksgiving. Malone, a leader in mRNA vaccine technology, expressed concerns over recent appointments, particularly the Surgeon General and FDA positions, which have raised controversy among those involved in the medical freedom movement. He emphasized that the Director of the NIH, while influential, doesn’t hold direct power over the various institutes within the organization. Malone criticized the NIH for becoming a “pork barrel” institution, heavily influenced by lobbying and congressional interests, which has stifled innovation and oversight. He pointed out that NIH funding is often tied to prevailing institutional paradigms, discouraging independent or alternative research. Additionally, Bannon highlighted concerns over the Surgeon General’s ties to the pharmaceutical industry, echoing worries that she may not be committed to medical freedom, a stance important to their audience.

Dave Walsh Highlights The Amount Of Energy It Will Take To Sustain Artificial Intelligence

Steve Bannon and Dave Walsh discussed the current state of energy policy, particularly in the context of the U.S. and its energy needs. Walsh criticized the “green” energy agenda, particularly the COP29 summit’s push for developed nations, including the U.S., to fund $500 billion annually for climate initiatives in developing countries. He emphasized the impracticality of relying on solar, wind, and battery storage to meet energy demands, especially with the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI), which requires massive amounts of power for data centers. Walsh pointed out that AI data centers need energy equivalent to powering entire cities, which cannot be sustained by renewable sources alone.

He proposed focusing on advanced gas-fired power plants and de-incentivizing the use of expensive, intermittent energy sources like solar and wind. He also suggested dismantling EPA regulations that restrict natural gas usage and advocated for policies that encourage coal and gas for electricity generation. Walsh concluded by stressing the importance of a legislative agenda and using tariffs to reduce reliance on foreign-made renewable energy equipment.

Joe Allen: “What I’m Worried About Is The People Who Are Gonna Deploy These Robots”

Joe Allen expressed concerns about the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI), emphasizing that the real danger lies not in the technology itself but in how powerful corporations and governments are using it. He described AI’s growing role in areas like education, corporate culture, and potentially military decision-making as contributing to “human atrophy”—a process where humans rely more on machines for information and decision-making, leading to a decline in human intelligence and independence. While Allen isn’t worried about robots taking over, he fears the humans deploying AI will prioritize machines over people. He criticized politicians for not taking meaningful action to address this transformation. Allen’s book, Dark Aeon, outlines these concerns and predicts the growing influence of AI, suggesting a troubling future if current trends continue. Steve Bannon acknowledged Allen’s foresight, calling his work prophetic and warning that unless action is taken, this shift could lead to a darker future.