Steve Bannon Calls On President Trump’s Legal Team To Sue Scott Galloway

Steve Bannon, on January 8, 2025, criticized Scott Galloway and the “Morning Joe” team, blaming them for the economic decline of America’s middle and working classes. He accused them of embodying the Washington consensus, which he claims has consistently ignored the needs of ordinary Americans while advancing the interests of the elite.

Bannon mocked Galloway’s discussion of personal struggles, dismissing it as a distraction from substantive issues. He argued that the Democratic Party, starting with Bill Clinton, abandoned the working class in favor of globalization and policies that benefited the donor class. He cited rising wages for blue-collar workers under Trump as evidence of successful economic initiatives and contrasted them with inflationary policies under Biden, which he argued have harmed workers.

Highlighting an article by Jonathan Weisman in The New York Times, Bannon emphasized how the Democratic Party’s estrangement from working-class voters became evident after Trump’s 2016 victory. He accused figures like Galloway of being apologists for a failed system and predicted that populist-nationalist movements would rise against the “globalist elitists.”

Bannon passionately defended Trump against accusations of insurrection and rape, arguing that Trump’s policies directly benefited disenfranchised communities, including African Americans and Hispanics. He criticized the outsourcing of American jobs to China, condemning it as exploitative and harmful to both American and Chinese workers. Bannon concluded by calling out the political elite for their negligence and disdain for the nation’s working people.

Part One:

Steve Bannon Blasts Scott Galloway’s Delusional Take On President Trump As Perfect Example Of Why Democrats Lost Base

Part Two:

Col. John Mills Breaks Down How Globalist And CCP Forces Are Behind Emerging Conflict In South Korea

Steve Bannon and John Mills recently discussed a concerning situation in South Korea, drawing parallels to globalist struggles and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) influence. Mills highlighted the impeachment of South Korea’s president and the ensuing political turmoil, noting that the acting president, Lee, is from the Democrat Party, which mirrors globalist tactics. He emphasized the presence of CCP supporters among the protesters, with some even labeling the U.S. as an “occupying force.” Mills expressed concern over potential violence and the precariousness of the situation, urging support for South Korea and a strong response to CCP interference.

E.J. Antoni: "The Government In China Is Spending The Equivalent Of Trillions Of U.S. Dollars To Prop Up Their Failing Economy.”

In a recent discussion on the WarRoom, Steve Bannon and EJ Antoni delved into China’s economic strategies and their implications for the U.S. under a potential Trump administration. Antoni highlighted the CCP’s attempts to prop up its failing economy through massive fiscal and monetary stimulus, essentially spending trillions to counteract the inefficiencies of their state-controlled capitalism. Bannon questioned whether this was a preemptive move against anticipated Trump policies like tariffs, suggesting China might be artificially lowering export prices to offset future U.S. trade actions.

Antoni explained that the Chinese are devaluing their currency, the yuan, to gain an export advantage, a move reminiscent of currency manipulation tactics. He noted this could undermine American producers by making Chinese goods even cheaper. Bannon expressed concern over this strategy, suggesting it’s part of a broader geopolitical game where China might use economic failures as a pretext for military aggression, referencing historical examples like Germany in the 1930s.

The conversation also touched on global implications, with Antoni discussing a worldwide trend of moving away from the U.S. dollar, which could complicate Trump’s economic policies. They warned of the possibility of orchestrated market disruptions by the “deep state” to undermine Trump’s economic plans, similar to what was allegedly done to former UK PM Liz Truss.

This dialogue painted a picture of an economically tense world where strategic financial maneuvers by China could lead to broader conflicts, with Trump’s administration potentially facing significant challenges in re-establishing American economic dominance.

Mike Davis Describes "Drive-By Shooting” Attempt By Jack Smith To Smear President Trump With Special Counsel Report

In a recent WarRoom discussion, Mike Davis and Steve Bannon tackled the latest legal maneuvers concerning Donald Trump. Davis highlighted that Judge Cannon had ordered a stand-down on Jack Smith’s report, which he described as a “one-sided political drive-by shooting” aimed at smearing Trump. This report, according to Davis, lacks courtroom rebuttal opportunities for Trump, making it an unethical move by Garland and Smith.

Bannon expressed confusion and concern over Garland’s decision to allow an in-camera review by Congress, predicting leaks would swiftly follow, tarnishing Trump’s image before his inauguration. Davis stressed the unprecedented and unethical nature of releasing such reports without pending charges, suggesting it’s a last-ditch smear campaign by Biden’s administration.

They also discussed the implications of New York’s legal actions against Trump, with Davis hoping for a Supreme Court intervention to halt what he sees as partisan prosecution. Bannon questioned the legal pathways available to Trump to stop what he views as an attempt to sentence the president-elect, emphasizing the potential damage to American judicial norms.

The conversation then shifted to Trump’s upcoming policies, particularly on immigration, with Bannon highlighting the resistance from sanctuary cities like Chicago, while Davis warned of legal consequences for mayors obstructing federal immigration enforcement. Both emphasized the need for robust external support for Trump’s agenda, with Davis promoting his Article Three Project to mobilize public and legal backing for Trump’s judicial and policy initiatives.