On Friday’s WarRoom, Peter Navarro and Adam Molon talked about how dark money, particularly from corporate globalists and left-leaning donors, continues to erode the integrity of the U.S. electoral system. The Lincoln Project, a self-proclaimed Republican organization, is a prime example of how wealthy interests influence elections under the guise of protecting democracy. This manipulation raises concerns about the erosion of traditional civil liberties and the growing power of shadowy political funding.

The Lincoln Project’s Financial Ties: A Dark Money Powerhouse

According to Molon’s reporting, The Lincoln Project, which rose to prominence during the 2020 election with its vehement anti-Trump ads, is now being exposed for its deep ties to corporate and left-wing donors. According to Adam Molon’s analysis, during the 2024 election cycle, the Lincoln Project has raised over $14 million, with over $12 million already spent. However, a significant portion of these funds is not used for political campaigns but funneled into firms controlled by its leadership. For instance, over $500,000 went to Reed Galen’s consulting firm, over $600,000 to co-founder Rick Wilson, and over $100,000 to Wilson’s son, Andrew Wilson.

This financial pattern isn’t new. During the 2020 election, the Lincoln Project raised a staggering $87 million, much of which also went to entities owned by its leaders. As Molon pointed out, "It’s a story of rampant self-dealing.” Instead of prioritizing its stated mission, the Lincoln Project is enriching its founders at donors’ expense.

Who’s Funding the Lincoln Project? Corporate Giants and Left-Wing Donors

While the Lincoln Project waves the banner of "Republicans against Trump,” it’s increasingly clear that much of its funding comes from far-left and corporate sources. Key donors in the 2024 cycle include Christy Walton, a Walmart heiress, and Charles Bronfman, a billionaire formerly connected to Seagram’s liquor empire. As Molon revealed, "Google has donated over $57,000 to the Lincoln Project,” raising eyebrows about corporate influence in political advertising. Google’s involvement has sparked particular concern given recent reports of its efforts to manipulate search results in favor of Democratic candidates like Kamala Harris.

Navarro emphasized the dangerous implications of these corporate ties, stating that Walmart’s business model relies on "sweatshop labor from China” and that Trump’s America First policies are a direct threat to their bottom line. By funding the Lincoln Project, corporate giants like Walmart can undermine policies that would bring jobs back to the U.S. while maintaining their reliance on cheap, foreign labor.

Dark Money and the Erosion of Civil Liberties

The rise of dark money in American elections signals a troubling erosion of traditional civil liberties. As Navarro pointed out, the Lincoln Project is nothing more than a "conduit for leftist money to attack Trump under the guise of Republicanism.” This manipulation of the political landscape is part of a broader effort to control public discourse and marginalize populist voices.

When corporations like Google and Walmart, with their vast resources and globalist interests, can bankroll political action committees (PACs) like the Lincoln Project, the result is a political system that prioritizes corporate interests over those of average Americans. Navarro warned that this dark money campaign against Trump is designed to "take your job, take your community’s factories, and expose your communities to all of the vagaries of illegal immigration.”

Conclusion: A Call to Action

The revelations about the Lincoln Project’s funding highlight the urgent need to address the corrosive influence of dark money on American elections. These shadowy financial networks not only distort electoral outcomes but also erode civil liberties by silencing voices that challenge the corporate and globalist status quo. As Molon’s analysis shows, the Lincoln Project is emblematic of a broader problem in U.S. politics, where moneyed interests dictate political outcomes under the cover of partisanship.

To protect democracy and preserve civil liberties, activists must demand greater transparency in political funding and reject the influence of corporate-backed entities masquerading as grassroots movements. The 2024 election is a battleground not just for candidates but also for the future of American sovereignty and the rights of its citizens.

For more context, watch the entire WarRoom segment featuring Adam Molon’s reporting:

Adam Molon Exposes The Financial Backers Of The Lincoln Project: Google, Walmart Heirs, And More