Monday, June 24

Kelly: Judge Cannon Presses Special Counsel For Answers On Who Is Supervising Jack Smith

In a conversation between Steve Bannon and Julie Kelly, Kelly reported from Miami about a significant courtroom session where Judge Cannon harshly criticized special counsel Jack Smith, questioning the congressional authority and funding oversight for his appointment. The morning session debated a motion to dismiss based on Smith’s allegedly improper appointment, while the afternoon focused on a proposed gag order to prevent Trump from making public statements about the law enforcement agents involved in his case. Judge Cannon was unconvinced by the DOJ’s arguments linking Trump’s social media posts to threats against law enforcement. Additionally, the discussion highlighted the prosecutor’s unprofessional behavior and anticipated further hearings on evidence suppression related to the Mar-a-Lago raid.

The conversation also touched on the upcoming Supreme Court decisions on crucial cases like Fisher and presidential immunity, expressing concerns about political pressures on the court. Finally, they criticized CNN’s handling of Trump-related debates and highlighted the broader political and legal implications of these developments.

Bossie: The Commission On Presidential Debates Is DEAD

In a discussion between Steve Bannon and Dave Bossie, they criticize CNN’s biased coverage and refusal to host voices that challenge their views, labeling it as dangerous for America. They reflect on President Trump’s debates, highlighting CNN’s and the Presidential Debate Commission’s perceived biases against him. Bannon and Bossie recount incidents from the 2016 and 2020 campaigns, such as technical manipulations and strategic placements of controversial figures, and celebrate the recent cancellation of all Presidential debates by the commission as a victory. They also express skepticism about replacing Biden with another Democratic candidate, suggesting that any change would still face significant internal party conflicts. They conclude by discussing the influence and funding behind the debate commission, criticizing its operation and advocating for a more transparent, free-market approach to political debates.

Toboroff: Jews Have Yet To Cross The Rubicon By Voting Against Democrats

In a conversation between Steve Bannon and Jackie Toboroff, they express deep concern over recent violent incidents targeting Jewish communities in Los Angeles. Bannon describes witnessing violence and police inaction in a predominantly Jewish area near CBS Studios, likening it to historical riots like Watts and Rodney King. Toboroff comments on the prevalence of what she calls “Sharia supremacists” and criticizes the majority of American Jews for voting Democrat, likening it to Stockholm syndrome. Bannon and Toboroff specifically call out political figures like AOC and Bernie Sanders for their association with individuals they deem anti-Semitic, highlighting the troubling nature of the violence and political climate they perceive.

Gableman: “Racine Recall” Of Robin Vos Has WSJ Editorial Board In Total Meltdown

In a conversation between Steve Bannon and Judge Gableman, they discuss criticism from the Wall Street Journal regarding Gableman’s stance on the 2020 election and his involvement in efforts to recall Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos. Gableman vehemently dismisses the Wall Street Journal’s claims as baseless and accuses the publication of protecting Vos, whom he alleges is complicit in election fraud. Gableman argues that Vos has maintained control over the Wisconsin Elections Commission, which he claims has facilitated voter fraud, including keeping inaccurate voter rolls and allowing the manipulation of absentee ballots. Bannon and Gableman emphasize the importance of addressing these issues to ensure a fair election in 2024, with Gableman insisting that removing Vos from his position is crucial for achieving election integrity in Wisconsin.

HARNWELL: People don’t realise the extent to which France has already gone over to Marine Le Pen

In their conversation, Ben Harnwell and Steve Bannon discuss the geopolitical implications of recent events, including Ukraine’s use of U.S. missiles in Crimea and the broader context of global tensions. Harnwell criticizes the escalatory nature of such actions, contrasting them with more extreme scenarios like attacking Moscow. They emphasize the widespread propaganda and lack of public awareness, particularly in the UK, about the complexities of the situation.

The discussion shifts to the political climate in France, where Bannon highlights a growing right-wing movement, particularly among the youth, dissatisfied with the economic management and perceived incompetence of the establishment. He mentions a Financial Times headline noting the increasing support for Marine Le Pen’s National Rally over President Emmanuel Macron’s alliance. Harnwell criticizes the ruling elites as incompetent and disconnected from the public’s needs, suggesting that their failure to address immigration and other key issues is fueling a revolutionary sentiment among the populace.

The conversation also touches on the broader implications of these political shifts, the role of immigration in driving populist nationalism, and the inability of political classes to engage in meaningful debate on such issues. Bannon and Harnwell foresee significant changes on the horizon, driven by the public’s frustration with the status quo.

Finally, Harnwell mentions the deteriorating situation in Ukraine, including the drafting of women into the military, and suggests that as the situation worsens, the need for alternative strategies becomes more apparent. He encourages the audience to follow his content on social media for further updates and analysis.