Retired U.S. Navy Captain James Fanell criticized retired General Mark Milley, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, for his post-retirement comments on former President Trump. Fanell argued that Milley’s actions breach military ethics and highlight concerning trends in the politicization of the U.S. military.
Criticism of Milley’s Comments on Trump
James Fanell, a retired Navy Captain and former senior intelligence officer, strongly criticized General Mark Milley’s recent public remarks about Donald Trump. Milley, who had previously served as the top U.S. military officer, described Trump as a potential threat to the nation, even suggesting he exhibited traits of a “fascist.” Fanell viewed Milley’s statements as a violation of the ethical standards expected of former military leaders.
Fanell noted, "These kinds of acts call into question the oath they took—defending against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” He argued that Milley’s remarks undermine the core constitutional principle of civilian control over the military. If Milley had legitimate concerns about Trump’s fitness as Commander-in-Chief, Fanell suggested he should have addressed them privately while still in office.
A Breach of Military Ethics?
Fanell emphasized that General Milley’s role as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff was advisory, not operational. As an advisor to the President, Milley’s duty was to offer counsel, not to criticize a sitting or former President post-service publicly. "Milley’s comments show contempt for the office of the presidency,” Fanell remarked, highlighting how this contradicts the military’s tradition of non-partisanship.
Comparisons to Historical Figures: A Loss of Professionalism
Fanell compared General Milley’s behavior to historical military figures who maintained neutrality, even under pressure. He referenced General George Marshall, a former Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, who famously abstained from voting to avoid any appearance of political bias. According to Fanell, Milley’s recent remarks signal a worrying shift in the conduct of senior military officials, moving away from professionalism.
"Milley’s actions are unprecedented,” Fanell stated. He believes that such actions harm the reputation of the U.S. military as a politically neutral institution. Fanell argued that if Milley felt strongly against Trump’s leadership, he should have resigned during his tenure rather than airing grievances years later.
The Financial and Political Aftermath
Fanell also criticized Milley’s post-retirement career, suggesting that his actions may have been motivated by financial and political incentives. Since leaving the military, Milley has taken on roles with major defense contractors, benefiting from his status as a former high-ranking officer. Fanell called Milley "an arrogant person” and accused him of using his former position for personal gain.
"He has gone from being Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to leveraging that role for financial gain,” Fanell said, highlighting what he perceives as a trend of former military officials profiting from their influence.
Civil-Military Relations Under Strain
Fanell’s critique extends beyond Milley, warning that the broader trend of military leaders engaging in partisan debates threatens U.S. civil-military relations. "These are not inconsequential people,” Fanell noted, stressing that the words and actions of four-star generals profoundly impact the military’s image. He asserted that officers of such rank are responsible for upholding the integrity of the institution they once served.
The Importance of Neutrality in U.S. Military Leadership
Fanell’s comments echo concerns that politicization of the military could erode trust among Americans. He emphasized the need for military leaders to remain focused on their duties rather than engaging in political discourse. "This is not helpful for the Republic in any way, shape, or form,” Fanell concluded.
Fanell underscored the significance of maintaining a professional and neutral military, especially during politically divisive times in his discussion with Dr. Brad Thayer. His criticisms of Milley serve as a cautionary tale for future military leaders about the importance of honoring their oaths, upholding constitutional values, and keeping politics out of military service.
For more of our coverage of Fanell:
Biden Administration’s Foreign Policy Failure: Thailand’s Shift to Swedish Fighters as a Case Study
For more context, watch this full WarRoom segment:
Capt. James Fanell Blasts Generals For Their Trump Comments, And Breaks Down The Hyperaggressive CCP
