Friday, August 30

Dr. Navarro: “Walz’s Ties To China Present A Clear Economic And National Security Risk”

Peter Navarro, in a recent broadcast, highlighted concerns over Tim Walz’s connections with China, labeling him a potential "Manchurian candidate” due to his extensive ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Navarro criticized Walz for his long-standing business relationships with Chinese officials and his tendency to praise China’s authoritarian regime. He pointed out Walz’s questionable actions, such as celebrating the Tiananmen Square massacre anniversary and his financial connections with the CCP.

Navarro argued that Walz’s influence and reluctance to confront China on key issues, like intellectual property theft and military aggression, pose serious risks to U.S. national security. He emphasized that Walz’s positions and connections should be scrutinized, asserting, "Waltz’s ties to China present a clear economic and national security risk.” Navarro also predicted that Walz’s connections could undermine America’s stance against China if he were to assume a higher political position.

Adam Molon On CCP Influence In Our Elections: “Harris-Walz Would Be Clear Favorite For The CCP”

In a conversation on War Room, Peter Navarro introduces Adam Molon, who speaks fluent Chinese, to discuss Chinese media perspectives on Tim Walz. Molon explains that Chinese state-run media, like Phoenix TV, suggest that Walz’s close ties to China might influence a softer U.S. policy towards China under a Harris-Walz administration. Molon highlights Walz’s deep connections to China, including frequent trips, teaching positions, and business ventures there. He suggests these ties might make Walz a preferred candidate for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Navarro and Molon discuss “elite capture” tactics by the CCP, such as financial incentives and personal relationships, to influence American politicians. Molon notes that some U.S. exchange programs Walz participated in were funded by Chinese entities, hinting at potential conflicts of interest. The conversation ends with Molon committing to monitor Chinese media for further developments.

Captain James Fanell Explains How The U.S. Has Turned Its Back On The Kingdom Of Thailand

In a discussion on the “War Room,” retired Captain James Fanell and Peter Navarro critiqued the Biden administration’s foreign policy following Thailand’s decision to purchase Swedish aircraft over American F-16s. Navarro emphasized the economic and security benefits of selling F-16s, highlighting job creation and reduced need for American troops abroad. He lamented the loss as a failure of Biden and Harris’s foreign policy, which he sees as neglectful of long-time allies like Thailand.

Fanell linked the shift to Thailand’s new pro-China government and argued that U.S. neglect since the Obama era had eroded ties. He cited military coups and U.S. diplomatic responses that pushed Thailand closer to China. Both criticized the U.S. State Department and Pentagon for failing to support allies and maintain military-industrial capacities. They underscored the importance of strong diplomatic and industrial policies to counter China’s growing influence in Southeast Asia.

Richard Baris Reveals Why Polls Are Slanted

In their discussion, Peter Navarro and Richard Barris analyzed recent political polling trends and the impact of Kamala Harris’s recent interview. Barris criticized Harris’s interview as poorly executed and lacking substance, suggesting it failed to address key issues like her inconsistent stance on fracking. He noted that despite efforts to project positive messaging, Democrats are increasingly worried about polling results. Barris highlighted the potential manipulation in polls, mentioning techniques like oversampling or timing manipulations, and criticized ABC News and 538 for potentially skewing results to favor Democrats. Barris also discussed the significance of RFK Jr.’s exit from the presidential race, revealing that a significant portion of his supporters might shift to Trump, potentially altering the electoral landscape. They concluded by touching on Tulsi Gabbard’s past influence and its possible implications for the current political climate.

Part One:

Richard Baris On President Trump’s Gain From RFK Jr’s Endorsement

Part Two:

Dr. Navarro: “Bureau of Prisons Will Break The Law If They Do Not Allow Steve To Go To Home Confinement 42 Days Earlier Than His Release Date”

Peter Navarro has called for Steve Bannon’s immediate release from prison, arguing that Bannon, as a key political strategist, should be free to participate in the upcoming 2024 election. Navarro criticized the different judicial treatments they received, noting that Bannon was sent to prison despite having a pending appeal, while Navarro himself was not granted similar relief. He highlighted a dissenting opinion from Judge Walker, which suggested significant legal issues with Bannon’s case and should have justified his release pending appeal.

Navarro also emphasized that Bannon is entitled to earlier release under the First Step Act and Second Chance Act due to good behavior. He condemned the Bureau of Prisons for failing to adhere to these laws, arguing that Bannon’s full term in prison is a legal and moral injustice. Navarro called for more media coverage of these issues, asserting that Bannon’s release would be crucial for his role in the 2024 election.