Friday, August 16

Dr. Peter Navarro: The Kamala Takedown Protocol – Attack The Flanks

Peter Navarro’s comments focus on the upcoming election, criticizing Vice President Kamala Harris and her policies. He emphasizes the urgency of the 2024 election, warning that a loss could mean the end of America as we know it. Navarro mocks Harris’s vision, calling it “Camelot with a K,” a mix of “inflation,” “bordered chaos,” and “woke” politics. He dismisses the media’s sanitized portrayal of Harris, branding her as embodying “radical wellness” and “supreme incompetence.”

Navarro proposes a strategy for attacking Harris, termed the “Kamala takedown protocol.” He suggests highlighting her controversial positions, such as her support for banning fracking, and contrasting them with the successful energy policies of Donald Trump. He explains that Harris’s proposed fracking ban would harm Pennsylvania’s economy, disrupt global oil markets, and undermine U.S. energy independence, ultimately benefiting hostile foreign powers like Russia and Saudi Arabia.

He also criticizes Harris’s competence, referencing her “mediocre law school” background and lack of substantive experience. Navarro argues that her radical policies and incompetence make her an easy target for criticism, proposing to showcase the negative impacts of her policies and compare them to Trump’s effective energy strategies.

Navarro frames the fight against Harris as a political battle and a defense of American economic and national security interests.

Part One:

Dr. Navarro Takes Down Kamala’s Economic Policy: “Kamala, You Broke The Economy With Bidenomics”

Part Two:

The Kamala Takedown Protocol – Kamala’s Climate Anxiety, Attacking ICE, And Defund The Police

Part Three:

David Bernhardt Exposes Kamala’s Historical Radical Energy Policy

Former Secretary of the Interior David Bernhardt and Peter Navarro discussed the contrasting energy policies of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris. Bernhardt, featured in Navarro’s book The New MAGA Deal, criticized the Biden administration’s approach to energy policy, notably its departure from Trump-era strategies.

Bernhardt highlighted Trump’s achievements in promoting energy independence, emphasizing deregulation, and expanding access to federal lands, which led to substantial savings for American families. He contrasted this with the current administration’s policies, which he argues have led to higher energy prices and less economic benefit. "The federal government controls a large amount of land that is available and accessible for energy development,” Bernhardt noted. "Essentially, the Biden Administration’s policy is as little involvement in the utilization of those lands as possible.”

Navarro also criticized Harris’s stance on energy, particularly her support for banning fracking, which he believes would negatively impact Pennsylvania’s economy and U.S. energy independence. Bernhardt echoed these concerns, stating that Harris’s opposition to fracking contradicts her recent attempts to moderate her position for electoral reasons. He asserted, "Fracking is critical to the economic and national security of this country,” underscoring the significant role of this technology in achieving energy independence and economic growth.

The discussion framed Harris’s policies as starkly contrasting to Trump’s proven track record, arguing that the current administration’s energy policies are detrimental to the economy and national security.

James Rickards Reveals Kamala/Walz Team’s Strategy To Take Cover Behind The Media

In this discussion between Jim Rickards and Peter Navarro on economic policies and geopolitical strategies, Rickards shared insights into the American and global economies, emphasizing the need for strategic economic decisions. Rickards, known for his financial newsletter Strategic Intelligence, criticized the current administration’s approach to economic policies and geopolitical issues. He highlighted the historical debate between the American System, championed by figures like Alexander Hamilton and Donald Trump, which supports tariffs and strong national infrastructure, and the globalist neoliberal approach, which he associates with figures like Bill Clinton and recent Democratic administrations.

Rickards argued that the Biden-Harris administration’s policies, particularly their handling of energy and foreign relations, are ineffective. He suggested that lowering oil prices to $40 per barrel would undermine Russia’s economy and pressure it to negotiate, criticizing the administration’s failure to leverage U.S. energy production for strategic advantage. Rickards also questioned the competence of the Biden-Harris team, contrasting it with the more economically astute policies of the Trump administration. The discussion underscored Rickards’ belief in a return to more robust, nationalist economic policies as a remedy for current economic and geopolitical challenges.