Friday, June 21

Kelly: Judge Cannons Evidentiary Hearing Precursor For What To Expect In Next Week’s Hearings

Julie Kelly and Steve Bannon discuss the contentious legal proceedings involving Jack Smith and Judge Cannon’s handling of the case against Donald Trump. Judge Cannon faces criticism for allegedly dragging out the process, but her defenders argue she aims for thoroughness given the case’s high profile. At the heart of the debate is the constitutionality of Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel, which some see as unnecessary to question, while others insist on its importance for transparency. Kelly criticizes the portrayal of Cannon as a partisan judge, arguing her detailed approach ensures a fair judicial process. Significant upcoming motions and hearings, including discussions on the scope of prosecution and the constitutionality of obtained evidence, could drastically impact Trump’s case and the broader concept of presidential immunity. This legal battle highlights the divergent perspectives on judicial management and its potential far-reaching effects on the Justice Department.

Chattah: Nevada Fake Elector Case Thrown Out In Big Win For MAGA

In a conversation with Steve Bannon, Sigal Chattah celebrates a significant legal victory where a Nevada state judge dismissed cases against six Trump electors. Chattah credits this win to a non-partisan approach to justice, noting that the judge focused purely on legal principles rather than political bias. The case, which she believes was unjustly brought by a Democrat attorney general influenced by external pressures, was dismissed due to jurisdictional issues and lack of substantial evidence. Chattah highlights the importance of a fair judicial system free from political influence and suggests this case could serve as a template for similar legal battles in other states like Arizona and Michigan. She emphasizes the aggressive legal strategies of the Nevada GOP and expresses optimism about securing Nevada for Trump in future elections. Chattah also encourages public support for the defense fund set up for the Nevada six, emphasizing the need to continue fighting against politically motivated prosecutions.

Epshteyn: Special Counsel In Big Trouble In Florida

In a conversation with Steve Bannon, Boris Epshteyn highlighted the recent victories for President Trump and his supporters, emphasizing the American public’s growing disdain for President Biden despite biased media portrayals. Epshteyn noted the fundraising success for Trump’s campaign, overcoming previous deficits. They discussed the significant dissatisfaction within the Black community in cities like Milwaukee towards Biden, which poses a serious challenge for his reelection. Epshteyn criticized the unconstitutional gag orders against Trump, describing them as attempts to silence him and prevent the public from learning about the corruption within the cases against him. Looking ahead, Epshteyn anticipated critical upcoming legal battles, including major motions in Florida and Supreme Court decisions on presidential immunity and administrative state deconstruction, which are pivotal for Trump’s campaign and the broader political landscape.

Good: Investigations And Recounts Inevitable In Virginia’s 5th District

In a conversation with Steve Bannon, Bob Good discussed the increasing irregularities and resistance in the election process within Virginia’s 5th District. He mentioned issues like unpostmarked ballots being accepted after Election Day in Lynchburg and opposition from the registrars in Albemarle and Buckingham. Good emphasized the need for a full hand-count audit of ballots to ensure the will of Republican voters is accurately reflected. He also accused his opponent of leveraging Democratic votes against him, which, though legal in Virginia, he views as unethical. Good described this battle as having national implications, pitting the Freedom Caucus against the DC establishment, and highlighted the significant financial and legal efforts required to challenge the election results.

Macgregor: Nothing Overseas Is More Important Than What’s Happening In America Now

In a discussion between Steve Bannon and Douglas Macgregor, they reflect on American public apathy towards government actions and war, recounting a story about a man unaffected by a government shutdown. Macgregor emphasizes that Americans historically have not wanted wars with countries like Russia, China, or Iran, and criticizes the involvement driven by agendas of certain elites. He shares his military background and a specific experience where he recommended the U.S. stay out of the Balkans, advice which was ignored, leading to involvement in conflicts he deemed strategically unnecessary.

Macgregor laments how influential figures like Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle have pushed for American military hegemony, leading to catastrophic wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Ukraine. He criticizes the enormous financial and human costs, and the flawed policy of printing money to fund these wars. The discussion highlights a disconnect between the military-industrial complex’s goals and the true interests of the American people. Macgregor argues that the American public has been sedated by consumerism and is largely indifferent to foreign policy, which has allowed misguided strategies to prevail.

Part One:

Macgregor: Our Border Is Bleeding And Needs To Be Secured

Part Two: