Gohmert: "Judges Need To Be On The Hot Seat When They Are Acting Inappropriately And Questioned”

Steve Bannon and former Congressman Louie Gohmert discussed the judiciary’s role in obstructing President Trump’s executive actions, particularly on immigration and government personnel. Bannon expressed frustration over judges blocking Trump’s policies, including deporting criminal gangs and removing bureaucratic roadblocks. He questioned the unchecked power of lifetime-appointed judges, arguing that delaying executive action equates to denying it.

Gohmert, recalling his time in Congress, criticized the reluctance to hold judges accountable. He noted that while Congress had impeached judges for criminal behavior, the Constitution allows removal for misconduct, not just crimes. He urged the House Judiciary Committee, led by Jim Jordan, to summon judges for questioning. Gohmert emphasized that judges are not beyond scrutiny and cited the 1948 law requiring recusal when impartiality is in doubt. He singled out judges like Beryl Howell, accusing her of anti-Trump bias and judicial overreach.

Bannon concluded that the judiciary must face accountability, advocating for a more aggressive approach to challenge judicial interference. The conversation underscored concerns over judicial activism, with both men pushing for oversight to ensure judges do not undermine Trump’s constitutional authority.

Part One:

Gohmert: "I’m Recommending The Judiciary And Oversight Committees Bring Judges In And Question Them”

Part Two:

FL-6 Special Election Will Determine Future Of President Trump’s Agenda

Steve Bannon and Randy Fine discussed the urgency of securing victory in Florida’s 6th Congressional District, emphasizing that every Trump supporter must vote. Fine outlined three key actions: voting, volunteering, and donating via VoteRandyFine.com. He stressed that 87% of Republicans in the district had not yet voted and urged them to take action immediately. President Trump hosted a Tele-Town Hall with Fine, reinforcing the importance of this election for advancing the Trump agenda in Congress. Fine highlighted early voting options and ongoing campaign efforts, noting that momentum is building daily. While he has campaign stops planned, he insisted the priority is voter turnout over attending events. Bannon echoed the need for a strong showing to silence critics doubting Trump’s influence. The goal is not just victory but a decisive win to demonstrate overwhelming support for Trump’s legislative priorities.

"Where Is Jim Jordan?” BREAKING: President Trump Asks SCOTUS To Step In On Alien Enemies Act Dispute

Steve Bannon criticized the slow response from Congress and the judiciary regarding President Trump’s legal battle over the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. He highlighted that Trump’s administration has applied to the Supreme Court for urgent intervention, questioning why Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan and others took so long to act. Bannon argued that judges should have been grilled publicly and that Trump’s team had to escalate the issue after an appellate court failed to act. He emphasized the need to go on offense, warning that these legal battles are escalating rapidly and require immediate, aggressive action.

University Of Texas Gives Award To Radical Brazilian Judge Behind Bolsonaro Lawfare

Steve Bannon and Paulo Figueiredo discussed the global battle between populist movements and radical leftist forces, focusing on President Trump and former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. Bannon warned that if the midterms were lost or stolen, Trump would face impeachment and further legal persecution. He highlighted how radicals aim to destroy individuals rather than debate ideas.

Figueiredo detailed how Bolsonaro is being targeted by Brazil’s judiciary, which he claims is rigged. The same court crushing populism in Brazil awarded its chief justice for “protecting democracy” at a U.S. university. He criticized American universities for spreading leftist ideology and questioned why radical foreign judges receive U.S. visas.

They emphasized the global nature of this political struggle, likening Bolsonaro’s persecution to Trump’s challenges. Despite winning elections, Bannon warned that their opponents would never stop. He urged building a broad electoral majority while going on offense against political lawfare.

Figueiredo cited the Brazilian chief justice’s remarks labeling conservative populists as a “negative wave” that must be resisted. He called for vigilance and direct action, urging people to stay informed through his website and social media. Bannon affirmed their shared fight for global populist movements.

Steve Bannon and Spencer Morrison discussed the significance of April 2nd as “Liberation Day,” marking President Trump’s aggressive trade policies aimed at restoring America’s economic independence. Morrison argued that since abandoning the gold standard in 1973, the U.S. economy has become overly reliant on foreign imports, leaving the nation vulnerable to global supply chains. Trump’s tariffs, particularly the 25% on automobiles, are intended to reverse this dependency and reindustrialize the country.

Bannon compared Trump’s vision to that of America’s Founding Fathers, emphasizing that true political independence requires economic self-sufficiency. Morrison reinforced this point by citing historical examples, such as British restrictions on American industry before the Revolution, which kept the colonies economically dependent. Trump’s long-standing commitment to tariffs, Morrison asserted, reflects his understanding that financial power dictates political power.

Both men criticized the mainstream media and financial elites for opposing tariffs, claiming they seek to suppress domestic industry in favor of globalist interests. Morrison shared his experience of being censored for discussing these topics, arguing that the elites deliberately lower American wages through mass immigration and offshoring. They concluded that Trump’s policies aim to realign the economy toward production, strengthening American workers rather than financiers.

"They Seek Our Destruction.” Frank Gaffney SLAMS Threat Assessment Of CCP And Fentanyl War

Steve Bannon and Spencer Morrison’s discussion focused on three key issues: the intelligence assessment, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and capital markets. Morrison criticized the recent intelligence report as deceptive and inadequate, failing to properly assess the CCP’s strategic threat, particularly regarding fentanyl and military aggression. He argued that the CCP is deliberately engaging in chemical warfare by flooding the U.S. with fentanyl, contradicting the report’s claim that China struggles to control the issue.

Morrison emphasized the need for a “Team B” intelligence assessment, similar to what Reagan used against the Soviet Union, to counteract intelligence failures and expose CCP corruption. He called for Tulsi Gabbard and John Ratcliffe to lead this effort.

The conversation also highlighted the geopolitical significance of Pete Hegseth’s visits to key Pacific islands, reinforcing America’s commitment to deterring Chinese aggression. Morrison stressed that Wall Street’s financial backing of China must end, aligning with President Trump’s February 21st declaration of a new economic approach. Ultimately, Bannon and Morrison positioned the CCP as the primary global threat and advocated for aggressive measures to counteract its influence.