President Trump Signs New EO’s From The Oval Office, Including The New ‘Gold Card’

President Trump signed Executive Orders and talked the media.

BENZ: LGBTQ Affinity Groups Wish Death Upon MAGA On NSA And CIA Servers

Steve Bannon and Mike Benz discussed alleged politically motivated activities within the U.S. intelligence community. Benz claimed that affinity groups, particularly LGBTQ+ networks, within agencies like the CIA and NSA used official communication channels to engage in political discourse, violating their mandate to focus solely on foreign threats. He cited reports that intelligence officials mocked conservative figures like Pat Robertson and labeled Tulsi Gabbard a Russian agent. Benz also tied this shift to Kamala Harris’ oversight of intelligence agencies, arguing that she pushed for cultural reorientation within these institutions. The discussion touched on the risks of blackmail and foreign intelligence exploitation, with Bannon highlighting concerns over politically motivated domestic surveillance. They framed this as a broader issue of intelligence agencies targeting U.S. citizens, raising fears of politicized operations. Ultimately, the conversation underscored their belief that intelligence agencies have become partisan enforcers rather than neutral security institutions under the current administration.

PRO BONO: Julie Kelly On Jack Smith’s War On Trump Being Assisted By Outside Law Firms

Part One:
Julie Kelly and Steve Bannon discussed President Trump’s latest move to strip security clearances from employees of Covington & Burling, a powerful DC law firm involved in lawfare against him. Kelly revealed that the firm provided Special Counsel Jack Smith with $140,000 in pro bono legal services, raising ethical concerns. Bannon emphasized that law firms run Washington, often switching between government positions and private practice to wield influence.

Trump’s executive order signals a broader crackdown on law firms engaged in politically motivated legal attacks, with potential future bans from government contracts. Kelly also highlighted the Supreme Court’s refusal to take emergency action on Biden appointee Hampton Dellinger’s firing, despite clear executive authority. This decision emboldened lower courts to challenge Trump’s executive actions, including a judge blocking billions in foreign aid reallocation.

Bannon and Kelly warned that activist judges in DC and New York are undermining Trump’s administration, while the Supreme Court remains hesitant to intervene. They also noted ongoing legal battles over personnel decisions, foreign aid, and investigations into Elon Musk’s government contracts. The discussion underscored Trump’s determination to dismantle entrenched legal and bureaucratic opposition while questioning the judiciary’s reluctance to act.

EXPOSED: J6 Prosecutors Lament On Fake News Over Termination, Julie Kelly Reports

Part Two:

BED CHECK VOTE: Eric Teetsel On Budget Vote That Has Nothing To Do With This Year’s Spending

Steve Bannon and Eric Teetsel discuss the complexities of Congress’s budget process, highlighting how it is intentionally made confusing to prevent voter accountability. Teetsel explains that the current vote is a “bed check” with no real impact, meant only to gauge attendance. The real issue is the upcoming fiscal year 2025 budget and the ongoing debate over funding through single appropriations bills or continuing resolutions (CRs).

Bannon clarifies that the reconciliation process is separate from government funding and focuses on long-term budget resolutions affecting mandatory spending, including proposed cuts over a 10-year period. Teetsel notes that leadership is using gimmicks to manipulate numbers and extend cuts while tying in Trump-era tax reforms.

The discussion shifts to how the budget resolution will interact with executive authority. Teetsel explains that Trump’s team, including Russ Vought, intends to leverage executive power to control spending through impoundment and rescissions. This “unified executive theory” could enable the administration to withhold or reallocate funds, triggering legal challenges.

Bannon emphasizes that this represents a major shift in governance, as the Trump administration seeks to dismantle entrenched bureaucratic power, setting the stage for an intense legal and political battle.