President Trump Signs EO Beginning To Abolish Department Of Education, Brian Glenn Reacts

Steve Bannon hailed March 20, 2025, as a historic day, marking President Donald Trump’s signing of an executive order to dismantle the Department of Education. Bannon emphasized that eliminating the department has been a longstanding conservative goal, dating back to Ronald Reagan. He predicted immediate legal challenges from the left, calling it a “judicial coup.” The event was orchestrated for maximum impact, featuring children behind Trump and key Republican governors in attendance. Bannon framed the move as striking at the “money-laundering” system between taxpayers and elite institutions. He highlighted Project 2025 and America First initiatives as crucial in reshaping governance. He described the political battle as a high-stakes collision with no compromise, asserting that Trump’s action signals a broader war against entrenched bureaucratic power. Bannon concluded with defiance, calling the move a decisive strike against the regime, leaving opponents to react in outrage.

Rep. Walberg On DoE: "We Want Education That Doesn’t Undermine Morality And Traditional Values”

Steve Bannon and Congressman Tim Walberg discussed the push to eliminate the Department of Education, with Walberg expressing his long-held desire to see it dismantled. He argued that federal bureaucracy has stripped power from parents, states, and local districts while burdening schools with excessive regulations, despite receiving billions in funding. Walberg believes eliminating the department would restore local control, allowing schools to focus on effective education rather than bureaucratic red tape.

Bannon raised concerns about criticism from academia, suggesting that higher education elites view this effort as a populist attack on educated individuals. Walberg rejected this notion, emphasizing the importance of diverse educational paths, including trade schools and apprenticeships, while upholding traditional American values. He noted that Michigan universities are willing to compete despite potential funding cuts, ensuring that vital research continues under the right conditions. The discussion set the stage for further debate on executive actions impacting education policy.

BOASBERG DOUBLES DOWN: Mike Davis Calls On Trump Admin To Ignore Deportation Orders

Steve Bannon and Mike Davis sharply criticized Judge Jeb Boasberg for his ruling that allegedly interfered with a national security operation involving the deportation of international terrorists and gang members. Davis argued that Boasberg overstepped his authority by ordering the White House to halt deportations and turn planes around mid-flight, posing severe risks to American lives and allies. He contended that the judge’s actions were lawless, dangerous, and an infringement on the president’s constitutional duty as commander-in-chief. Bannon emphasized that Davis, who typically advocates compliance with judicial orders, viewed this case as an exception due to its national security implications. Davis called for Boasberg’s impeachment, arguing that his unprecedented intervention set a dangerous precedent. Both warned that foreign nations might hesitate to cooperate with U.S. security operations if such judicial overreach continues. They stressed the need for accountability to deter future judicial interference in executive decisions.

Part One:

Mike Davis On President Trump’s Ability To Massively Slash The Size Of Agencies

Part Two:

Mary Holland: “She Got Inaccurate Medical Care, And That’s Why She Died”

Mary Holland, Dr. Koury and Brian Hooker cited medical evidence from medical records to show that the 6-year-old girl reportedly died from measles and other causes.

Brian Hooker Reveals 6 Year Old Girl Was Suffering From Pneumonia When She Passed, Not Measles

Part Two:

Dr. Pierre Kory Details How 6 Year Old Girl Was Given Wrong Antibiotics To Treat Pneumonia

Part Three:

Robert K. Tanenbaum Breaks Down The Assassination Of President John F. Kennedy

Steve Bannon and Robert K. Tanenbaum discussed the assassination of John F. Kennedy, focusing on the alleged involvement of the CIA and inconsistencies in the official narrative. They questioned the lone gunman theory, citing Lee Harvey Oswald’s connections to Cuban officials and the Bay of Pigs retaliation theory. Bannon highlighted Lyndon B. Johnson’s rapid policy reversals, including escalation in Vietnam, and his establishment of the Warren Commission, led by former CIA Director Allen Dulles, whom Kennedy had fired. Tanenbaum referenced Senator Richard Schweiker’s investigation, which suggested CIA involvement in JFK’s assassination. They also examined recently released documents, revealing CIA requests for redactions related to Israeli intelligence. Truman’s 1963 critique of CIA overreach and a 1964 CIA memo on Oswald’s training further fueled suspicions of government complicity. The discussion concluded with plans for further analysis, emphasizing deep-seated mistrust in official accounts and intelligence agencies.