Chong: BillBlaster App Puts Congress In Your Pocket

.Grace Chong discussed the impact of Bill Blaster, a tool designed to keep politicians accountable by providing real-time updates on legislative activity. She emphasized the expansion of the app, which now includes local office numbers for representatives, allowing citizens to call both their D.C. and district offices. Chong encouraged users to engage directly with politicians on social media, particularly through Twitter (X), where lawmakers actively monitor feedback.

She highlighted the difficulties in directly emailing representatives but noted that Bill Blaster provides a workaround by linking to official contact forms, streamlining public communication with lawmakers. The app also offers summaries and links to recent bills, enabling users to track and share legislation, while also voicing their opinions to elected officials. Chong stressed the importance of collective action, noting that even a few thousand calls can make a significant impact, as offices log every interaction.

She praised the role of grassroots activism in political change, citing the removal of Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Senate leader Mitch McConnell’s resignation, and RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel’s ousting as victories driven by engaged citizens. Chong underscored that Bill Blaster is a free tool designed for mass participation, urging users to provide feedback for continuous improvement. She framed social media and digital activism as critical tools for political engagement, reinforcing the idea that ordinary citizens can drive change by organizing and leveraging technology to hold leaders accountable.

Funding Condoms In Africa!?! Gaffney And Kennedy On Cutting Absurd Spending

Frank Gaffney and Brian Kennedy critique U.S. government spending, arguing that funds allocated under the guise of the “greater good” have been used to corrupt rather than build lasting alliances. Kennedy points out that while America has projected power globally, it has failed to make genuine allies, instead wasting taxpayer money on initiatives that serve ideological goals rather than national security.

Kennedy references how U.S. tax dollars are being spent on items like condoms for Mozambique while ignoring pressing issues elsewhere, questioning the logic behind such spending. He praises President Trump’s defense budget proposal, which suggested cutting 50% of U.S. military spending in exchange for similar reductions from China and Russia. He argues that such cuts could eliminate wasteful expenditures on social engineering projects within the military, while forcing geopolitical rivals to make real reductions in weapons programs.

Gaffney, who initially reacted with outrage to Trump’s proposal, acknowledges the broader issue of misplaced priorities in defense and foreign aid. They both agree that U.S. soft power, especially under Joe Biden, is failing to effectively counter China’s global influence. The discussion underscores the belief that Democrat-led spending initiatives have become slush funds for ideological projects rather than genuine national interests.

Ultimately, Kennedy and Gaffney advocate for a reevaluation of U.S. foreign policy and defense spending, emphasizing the need for a strategic approach that prioritizes American security over ideological or performative global interventions.

Steve Bannon: This Is A Coalition BIGGER Than 1932

Steve Bannon emphasized the ongoing struggle against the “deep state” and the establishment’s efforts to suppress political opponents, particularly Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro. He highlighted Bolsonaro’s recent indictment for contesting an election and compared it to the legal battles Trump faces, arguing that both leaders are being targeted because they remain popular challengers to the globalist agenda. Bannon claimed that the goal of the legal system is to imprison Trump indefinitely, reflecting a broader war against nationalist movements.

He pointed to recent Republican victories and shifting political demographics, particularly among African Americans and Hispanics, as evidence of a growing populist coalition. Bannon argued that minority voters are rejecting radical progressive policies and embracing conservative values, particularly on economic and social issues.

He framed the opposition as “demonic” forces attempting to reshape American culture through policies like transgender ideology and school indoctrination. However, he claimed that the Biden administration’s failures have exposed these radical shifts, awakening ordinary Americans to the need for change.

Bannon likened Trump’s movement to Roosevelt’s 1932 coalition, asserting that a broad-based alliance of working-class Americans can dismantle the entrenched elites and restore America’s founding values.

Frank Gaffney: Stop Underwriting The Enemy

Force Multiplier Academy At CPAC 2025 – Mike Davis

Steve Bannon and Mike Davis of Article Three Proejct addressed a fired-up audience about the ongoing political battles and victories of President Donald Trump, who is currently in office. Bannon started by emphasizing the high stakes of their fight against the “Deep State” and “administrative state,” drawing parallels between Trump’s struggles and those of Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro and South Korea’s leadership. He recounted Trump’s journey from uncertain primary days to winning the presidency again, crediting grassroots efforts at CPAC 2021, just 47 days after the contested 2020 election.

Bannon warned that despite Trump’s November 5, 2024, victory, the opposition remains relentless, wielding judicial power and media influence. He stressed that the fight for liberty is a daily grind, applauding the persistence of MAGA supporters and allies like Eduardo Bolsonaro, who spoke about his father’s legal persecution in Brazil, mirroring Trump’s own battles.

Davis updated the audience on confirming Trump’s cabinet picks, Attorney General Pete Hegseth, Tulsi Gabbard, and Kash Patel, soon-to-be FBI director. Davis credited the “War Room Posse” and the Article 3 Project for mobilizing 200,000 constituent contacts to pressure senators, overcoming initial skepticism from the political class.

He highlighted Trump’s first-term judicial legacy, transforming the Supreme Court into a 5-4 conservative majority, and outlined plans to appoint bolder judges in this term to counter activist resistance. Davis also addressed recent executive actions, like Trump’s order reinforcing the unitary executive theory under Article 2, which has sparked media backlash but aligns with constitutional principles to wrest control from unelected bureaucrats.

The discussion touched on specific conflicts, such as the Southern District of New York’s resistance to dismissing charges against Eric Adams, which Trump wants dropped to focus on immigration. Davis praised acting Deputy AG Aimo Bowie’s firm response, reinforcing accountability to the president. Bannon and Davis urged continued grassroots pressure via article3project.org, emphasizing that victories like these stem from relentless action. They framed the broader struggle as a global movement for freedom against entrenched elites, with the U.S. under Trump leading the charge, though judicial and bureaucratic challenges persist.

Force Multiplier Academy At CPAC 2025 – Tyler Bowyer

In a lively discussion between Tyler Bower and Steve Bannon, set in February 2025 with President Trump in office, the two explore grassroots political strategies that contributed to recent victories and outline plans for future elections. Bower and Bannon reference the “Stimulus of 2025” amid a national debt surpassing $36 trillion, framing the economic context of their political efforts. The conversation highlights a coalition dubbed “Maga plus,” which combines traditional MAGA supporters, low-information and low-propensity voters, and a growing “Maha” movement of “red-pilled” moms—former Obama voters now aligned with Trump’s agenda. This coalition, they argue, was pivotal in key states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona.

Bannon shares an apocryphal prison story about Elon Musk, noting their ideological differences—Bannon rejects transhumanism—but praising Musk’s critical support for their strategy. With his engineer’s mindset, Musk reportedly analyzed the electoral math and backed a grassroots push targeting disengaged voters. He sought a coordinator beyond marketing figures like Charlie Kirk, leading to a collaboration with Bower’s team at Turning Point Action. This effort focused on mobilizing voters who skipped previous elections despite being registered Republicans.

Bower explains “ballot chasing,” the offensive strategy complementing election integrity efforts. It targets “disengaged voters”—registered conservatives who didn’t vote in 2016 or 2020 due to personal circumstances like a bad day or logistical issues. By deploying full-time staff to reach these individuals, their team turned out enough votes to secure wins. Bannon reinforces this, admitting his initial disdain for mail-in ballots but recognizing the need to adapt to existing rules rather than concede defeat. In Pennsylvania, they encouraged voters to bypass the postal service by dropping ballots at county courthouses.

Looking ahead to the 2026 midterms, both stress the importance of sustaining this momentum without Trump on every ballot. They advocate for continued ballot chasing, election integrity, and grassroots mobilization, including recruiting judges of elections to influence future cycles. Bower cites Arizona as a model, where data-driven outreach correlated with electoral success. Bannon closes by rallying the “hardest workers”—the grassroots army—emphasizing their role as the backbone of this movement, poised to shape America’s political future under President Trump’s leadership in 2025.

Force Multiplier Academy At CPAC 2025 – Moms For America Panel

Caroline Wren highlighted the important activism and work of Moms for America in coming elections.