In a recent discussion on the Charlie Kirk show, Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk examined the political and cultural impact of President Donald J. Trump in the aftermath of the Thursday verdict against Trump.
Bannon, a Navy veteran and host of the WarRoom, highlighted the urgency he believes his audience must embrace by comparing the post-trial action plan for MAGA supporters to something like the Navy’s “General Quarters” protocol, which signifies a call for immediate and coordinated action in critical situations.
“General Quarters” is a Navy term signaling all personnel to prepare for battle or emergencies. When this alarm sounds, everyone must man their battle stations and be ready to respond swiftly and efficiently. This all-hands-on-deck approach ensures the ship’s safety and operational readiness.
Bannon has used this analogy to stress the importance of a unified and urgent response in the current political climate, urging supporters to be as prepared and focused as military personnel during General Quarters.
Charlie Kirk opened the Thursday conversation by stressing the ongoing struggle of everyday Americans against what he described as an elite class determined to silence them. He argued that Trump represents a beacon for these marginalized voices, bringing them into politics. Kirk insisted that despite the dark times, today’s actions will define the future, urging his audience to remain active and engaged.
Steve Bannon joined the discussion, stressing the need for focused efforts to support Trump’s campaign. He acknowledged the various factions opposing Trump, including the donor class, neoconservatives, neoliberals, and globalists. Bannon argued that Trump’s real crime in the eyes of these elites is not related to any legal documents but his status as a “class traitor.” Trump, according to Bannon, challenged the established order and empowered working-class Americans, making him a target for destruction by the entrenched political and economic powers.
Bannon pointed out that Trump’s ability to unify diverse groups, from urban communities to rural supporters, threatens the traditional power structures. He called on the audience to remain steadfast, work tirelessly, and focus on the fundamentals of political campaigning, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts. Bannon underscored perseverance and hard work, rather than financial resources, would be the keys to victory.
The conversation then shifted to a bigger political battle facing Trump’s supporters. Bannon criticized the Republican establishment for being out of touch and unengaged with the grassroots movement supporting Trump. He stressed that the current situation requires a departure from superficial politics and a commitment to deep, strategic engagement.
Kirk and Bannon also discussed the upcoming People’s Convention in Detroit, framing it as a critical moment to galvanize support and demonstrate the movement’s strength. Bannon called for a show of force for the event, particularly from minority communities, to reinforce the message that Trump’s movement is inclusive and robust.
Throughout the discussion, there was a sense of urgency and a call to action. Bannon’s remarks were infused with a combative tone, portraying the struggle as a battle between the grassroots and the elite. He urged his listeners to channel their energy and frustrations into productive efforts, reinforcing that relentless dedication makes victory attainable.
Ultimately, the conversation between Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon showcased the deep divisions in American politics and the sense of a looming existential threat that Trump’s movement poses to the established order.
Bannon and Kirk agreed and framed the MAGA struggle as one of everyday Americans against a powerful elite, with Trump as the pivotal figure empowering the common citizen.
The call to action was clear: remain focused, work hard, and leverage every opportunity to support the movement and ensure its success in the face of significant opposition.
WATCH:
Now that NY has rewrote Statute of Limitations Law Isn’t it plausible @HillaryClinton Putting Public Information on a Private Computer system is intent to conceal public information and is in Violation of this Statute (18 U.S.C. § 2071) (a) ?
https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system