"Every State Is A Border State.” FBI Director Patel Testifies In Front Of Senate Intel Committee

At a Senate hearing, FBI Director Kash Patel highlighted the threat posed by illegal migrants to not only his state but the entire nation. Addressing committee members, he emphasized the FBI’s focus on violent crime and national security, stressing that every state, including Arkansas, faces border-related challenges.

Since February 5th, the FBI and state and local law enforcement have arrested 220 illegal immigrants in Arkansas for crimes ranging from violent offenses and weapons violations to narcotics-related felonies. In total, 253 individuals have been charged. Over the past three weeks alone, thousands of pounds of narcotics—worth tens of millions of dollars—were seized, including fentanyl, meth, cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and synthetic drugs.

Patel acknowledged the critical role of state and local law enforcement in these operations, emphasizing their ground-level intelligence. He referenced a significant bust in southwest Arkansas that led to 17 federal indictments related to a meth lab, with suspects facing prosecution for trafficking illegal opioids, firearms, and contraband. He assured lawmakers that the FBI remains committed to relentless, year-round efforts to combat crime nationwide.

"We Were On The Brink Of WWIII” Jack Posobiec Reacts To DoD Signal Chat Leak

Jack Posobiec and Steve Bannon discussed the escalating tensions surrounding President Trump’s administration, emphasizing the Democrats’ attempts to undermine his policies and leadership. They highlighted ongoing global conflicts, including military actions in the Red Sea and geopolitical maneuvering by key figures like JD Vance and Trump’s emissaries. Bannon framed these conflicts as a broader strategy to shift U.S. economic and security policies under Trump’s America First agenda.

Posobiec warned that the Democrats are pushing for an independent investigation, targeting officials like Kash Patel, to weaken Trump’s administration. He compared their strategy to the RussiaGate hoax, arguing that they seek to paralyze the government through legal warfare and intelligence leaks. The goal, according to them, is to create internal infighting, delay Trump’s policies, and push for a judicial insurrection using radicalized courts.

Bannon and Posobiec argued that Trump is aware of this strategy and is working to counteract it while reshaping global economic structures. They emphasized that his survival of an assassination attempt reaffirmed his mission. The discussion concluded that the administration must fight back against Deep State forces attempting to obstruct Trump’s transformative agenda.

DNI Director Gabbard: "There Was No Classified Material Shared”

Senate hearing Part One:

Senate Intel Committee Holds Hearing On Worldwide Threats

Senate Hearing Part Two:

Steve Bannon: "They’ve Made Jeffrey Goldberg A Central Part Of The Story”

Jack Posobiec and Steve Bannon discussed what they see as a coordinated media and intelligence operation designed to manipulate public perception. Bannon warned that classified intelligence discussions behind closed doors allow senators like Angus King and Ron Wyden to selectively leak and frame narratives. He stressed the importance of taking a hard line to avoid being trapped by the media’s tactics.

Posobiec and Bannon singled out journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, accusing him of being a central figure in past political psyops, including the “suckers and losers” hoax and RussiaGate. They argued that Goldberg’s recent reporting, conveniently timed before a key Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, was a pre-planned hit job coordinated with Democratic staffers.

Bannon emphasized that intelligence leaks and media narratives are weaponized against Trump’s administration. He questioned whether government officials manipulated Signal chat communications to insert false narratives, likening the situation to previous deep-state interference. Both Posobiec and Bannon urged vigilance, asserting that this is a long-standing strategy used to control public discourse.

Bannon concluded that Trump’s administration should refuse to engage in media-driven distractions, instead focusing on intelligence efforts to prevent global conflict.

TAKE A HARD LINE: Bannon And Posobiec React To Political Theater From Democrats During Intel Hearing

Jack Posobiec and Steve Bannon engaged in a sharp critique of the ongoing political and intelligence battles within the U.S. government. Bannon emphasized that taking on the Deep State requires an uncompromising stance, as intelligence and law enforcement agencies, along with external operatives, operate in a coordinated effort to suppress political opposition. He criticized Michael Bennett for exploiting John Ratcliffe’s mistakes during a hearing, calling it a political “struggle session” akin to Maoist and Nazi tactics—where words are twisted and used against opponents.

Posobiec echoed these concerns, warning that engaging with adversarial forces on their terms only leads to manipulation. He highlighted the suspicious timing of leaks and political maneuvers, particularly regarding intelligence matters and signal chats. Bannon reinforced the necessity of a “hard line” approach, aligning it with President Trump’s stance against the administrative and judicial establishments. He framed Trump as a leader focused on peace, prosperity, and dismantling entrenched bureaucratic power.

Both Bannon and Posobiec urged resistance to the political show trials, arguing that engagement on the enemy’s terms is a losing strategy. They concluded that the fight against the Deep State is one of resilience and strategic defiance, rather than accommodation or compromise.

DEEP STATE FUEL: Bannon And Poso Call Out "Enemy Agents” Conducting Senate Intel Hearing

NOT A SEARCH FOR TRUTH: Steve Bannon SLAMS Signal Leak Hearing As "Political Information Warfare”

Jack Posobiec and Steve Bannon sharply critiqued the ongoing political and intelligence battles within the U.S. government. Bannon emphasized that taking on the Deep State requires an uncompromising stance, as intelligence and law enforcement agencies, along with external operatives, operate in a coordinated effort to suppress political opposition. He criticized Michael Bennett for exploiting John Ratcliffe’s mistakes during a hearing, calling it a political “struggle session” akin to Maoist and Nazi tactics—where words are twisted and used against opponents.

Posobiec echoed these concerns, warning that engaging with adversarial forces on their terms only leads to manipulation. He highlighted the suspicious timing of leaks and political maneuvers, particularly regarding intelligence matters and signal chats. Bannon reinforced the necessity of a “hard line” approach, aligning it with President Trump’s stance against the administrative and judicial establishments. He framed Trump as a leader focused on peace, prosperity, and dismantling entrenched bureaucratic power.

Both Bannon and Posobiec urged resistance to the political show trials, arguing that engagement on the enemy’s terms is a losing strategy. They concluded that the fight against the Deep State is one of resilience and strategic defiance rather than accommodation or compromise.