Sam Faddis and Dave Brat discussed the current state of the Democratic Party and its implications for American democracy on WarRoom on Thursday. Both commentators expressed deep concern about the party’s departure from traditional values and embrace of what they see as Marxist principles.

Faddis, known for his critical stance on political manipulation, underscored a troubling trend: the Democratic Party, once a bastion of working-class values, has evolved into what he describes as a “Marxist” entity. He contrasts today’s Democratic Party with the one his grandfather, a Democratic congressman in the 1930s and ’40s, would have recognized. "Good Lord, if he was alive today he’d tell you, I don’t see a Democratic party, I see a Marxist party,” Faddis stated, highlighting the significant ideological shift within the party.

Faddis also criticized the Democratic Party’s manipulation of democratic principles. He argues that the left has distorted the concept of democracy to fit their agenda, reducing it to a mere procedural formality rather than a genuine representation of the people’s will. According to Faddis, this manipulation extends to the handling of election laws and the media. He expressed frustration over how the term “democracy” is used to justify practices that undermine traditional democratic processes, such as the push for mail-in ballots and restrictive voter laws.

Dave Brat shared Faddis’s concerns, emphasizing the broader implications of this ideological shift. Brat questioned how suburban voters, traditionally aligned with conservative values, have shifted their support to the left. He attributes this to a broader societal transformation driven by economic instability and dissatisfaction with current policies. Brat highlighted the need for a return to foundational principles, suggesting that the erosion of these values is contributing to a crisis in American politics.

The discussion also touched on the influence of foreign and domestic agencies on U.S. politics. Faddis pointed out that the CIA and other intelligence agencies have historically been prohibited from interfering in domestic politics. However, he suggested that this boundary is being blurred, with these agencies becoming involved in shaping public opinion and political outcomes. He warned that this undermines the integrity of American democracy and calls for a crackdown on such illegal activities.

Faddis and Brat both argued for reinvigorating traditional values and returning to a more conservative political approach. They stressed the urgency of addressing these issues to preserve the integrity of American institutions and democratic processes. The conversation reflects a broader concern among some commentators that the Democratic Party’s shift away from traditional values and the influence of external forces on domestic politics are posing significant threats to American democracy.

For more context the full segment with Brat and Faddis:

The American Intelligence Apparatus Is Ignoring The Fundamental Rule To Not Influence Public Opinion