Tina Peters, the embattled Mesa County Clerk convicted on multiple charges, appeared on Tuesday’s WarRoom with Ben Harnwell and unleashed a torrent of unsettling accusations against her trial’s integrity and the broader election system. Peters, who faces sentencing in October, revealed the depths of her frustration and claimed that her trial was marred by unfair practices and concealed evidence.
Peters, found guilty on seven of ten charges, has been vocal about what she perceives as a deliberate effort to undermine her defense.
"The prosecution put on their dog and pony show… We had a little over a day, every expert…was excluded,” Peters declared, emphasizing her belief that key evidence was barred from reaching the jury.
According to Peters, her legal team struggled against a stacked deck, as crucial witnesses were excluded, and significant evidence was withheld.
Central to Peters’ claims is the allegation that the trial was tainted by conflicts of interest involving high-profile entities. She pointed fingers at Dominion Voting Systems and local officials, stating, "This is Dominion. Yes. And the Secretary of State and the AG.” Peters insists that the case reflects a broader conspiracy, alleging that the election systems are tainted by fraud and that her prosecution is a smokescreen.
Peters also criticized the judicial process, asserting that the jury was shielded from critical evidence that could have exonerated her. "The jury was prevented from hearing real evidence and hearing real witnesses,” she lamented. Peters’ defense was reportedly hampered by the exclusion of expert testimony and other evidence that she believes was essential to her case. She claimed that even the presence of key witnesses, such as forensic experts and whistleblowers, was obstructed by the court, contributing to what she described as a "miscarriage of justice.”
Further adding to the drama, Peters accused the Colorado Attorney General’s office of bias and misconduct. "The state Colorado attorney generals… brought up witnesses…that lied outright,” Peters alleged, claiming that there was evidence of deceit and corruption among the witnesses and prosecutors involved. She cited specific incidents, such as the exclusion of testimony from forensic experts, as evidence of the trial’s unfairness.
Despite her conviction, Peters is resolute in her fight. She is currently filing an appeal and remains hopeful that higher courts will offer a fair review. "We are filing an appeal… There is information in D.C that these attorneys know about that Colorado A.G said they didn’t have,” Peters said, indicating that she believes exculpatory evidence is being withheld.
As she awaits her sentencing, Peters remains defiant, promising to continue her battle against what she sees as a corrupt system. "Until they either kill me or put me in prison, I’m going to keep speaking out,” Peters declared, highlighting her determination to expose what she believes to be a systemic issue with election integrity.
CALL TO ACTION:
For those interested in following Peters’ ongoing fight and accessing related evidence, she directs them to her website, TinaPeters.us, where she has compiled information and reports on her case. "People need to see this… what these machines have done and deleted records all over the country,” Peters urged.
Peters’ statements paint a picture of a deeply flawed trial, marked by what she describes as systemic corruption and bias. Her claims continue to stir controversy and spark debate, making her case a focal point in election integrity and judicial fairness discussions.
For more context, watch the entire interview with Tina Peters:
