The Rogue’s Gallery: Naming Names in Washington Power Play

Steve Bannon, known for his fiery rhetoric, has pointed a sharp finger at Matthew Graves, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia in a WarRoom discussion with Julie Kelly on Monday. Appointed by President Joe Biden in November 2021, Graves has become a focal point of criticism for his role in prosecuting January 6 defendants. "Matthew Graves is the driver behind these prosecutions,” Kelly told Bannon, adding that Graves "took over existing cases and doubled down on political charges.”

Graves, Kelly noted, has deep ties to influential circles. He was a former law partner in Washington, D.C., with Doug Emhoff, the second gentleman. Graves’ wife, who runs a left-leaning nonprofit, has reportedly visited the White House over 40 times.

Bannon labeled these connections as evidence of "entrenched corruption.”

Bannon’s Verdict: "Matthew Graves Deserves 22 Years”

Bannon did not hold back, asserting that Graves should face consequences for what he described as politically motivated prosecutions. "Matthew Graves deserves at least 22 years in federal prison,” Bannon declared, equating the charges brought against January 6 defendants to abuses of justice. Highlighting cases like those of the Oath Keepers, who received severe sentences, Kelly argued, "These are not legitimate charges. They’re political, plain and simple.”

The Judiciary’s Role: Judges Under Fire

Kelly also lambasted federal judges, accusing them of facilitating a “vast criminal conspiracy” against Trump supporters. He criticized their decisions to deny venue changes for trials held in Washington, D.C., where he claims biases against January 6 defendants run deep. “These judges are acting like Nazi judges in the 1930s,” Kelly said, adding that they enable excessive sentences and cherry-pick evidence.

Judge Amit Mehta and Others: “Auditioning for Promotions”

Judge Amit Mehta, who has presided over high-profile January 6 cases, including those of the Oath Keepers, came under specific scrutiny. Kelly accused Mehta of imposing "excessive sentences” and acting as though he’s auditioning for higher positions.

"Mehta is destroying American Patriots,” Bannon charged, promising that any law firms hiring such figures would face protests. "If you hire Matthew Graves or others like him, you’ve got a problem with War Room.”

Connecting the Dots: Biden’s DOJ and Broader Implications

Bannon criticized Attorney General Merrick Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, accusing them of weaponizing the DOJ. He argued their actions are part of a broader strategy to criminalize political opposition. "This is a government using state power to crush dissent,” he said.

"The Reckoning is Coming”: What’s Next?

Looking ahead, Bannon predicted a sweeping reversal once Trump reclaims office. He vowed accountability for individuals like Graves, stating, "By late January 2025, he will be out as U.S. Attorney. And any firm that hires him will face public outrage.”

Bannon also hinted at possible pardons for January 6 defendants. "President Trump has pledged to review these cases,” he said, emphasizing the importance of restoring justice.

Conclusion: A Battle on All Fronts

Bannon’s remarks highlight a deepening divide over the January 6 prosecutions and the role of federal institutions. His call to "name and shame” figures like Graves signals an escalating effort to rally public opinion. For Bannon, the stakes are nothing less than the integrity of the justice system and the future of American democracy.

This story is far from over, and its implications will likely reverberate through the 2024 election and beyond.

Here are the judges that Bannon and Kelly discussed: 

Matthew Graves

Amit Mehta

Daney Friedrich

Royce Lamberth

For more context on this conversation with Julie Kelly, watch the following clips:

Julie Kelly Details The Crimes Against American Citizens Committed By Matthew Graves

Julie Kelly: “The Real Villains In Washington Are The Federal Judges”

Julie Kelly: “She (Friedrich) Was The First Judge To Sign Off On 1512(c)(2) In J6 Cases”

Julie Kelly: “The Most Preposterous Language Was Used By These Judges Without Consequence”