Jim Jordan’s Letter Sparks New Scrutiny on DOJ

Steve Bannon and journalist Julie Kelly appeared Friday in the WarRoom and discussed a crucial letter sent by House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan to Special Counsel Jack Smith. The letter urges Smith to preserve records amid growing allegations of misconduct by his office. "They need to do something with it,” Kelly emphasized, noting that Jordan’s move is a necessary step in holding officials accountable for their actions against Trump.

Jordan’s letter isn’t just a formal request—it signals that House Republicans may be gearing up to investigate alleged abuses within the DOJ, especially relating to Trump’s classified documents case in Florida. According to Kelly, there’s a "conspiracy between the Biden White House” and top DOJ officials, raising questions about politically motivated prosecution.

Special Counsel Jack Smith is not immune from transparency or above accountability for his actions in prosecuting President Trump.@Jim_Jordan, @HouseGOP and I will leave no stone unturned to hold him and the former J6 Select Committee accountable. https://t.co/JO6ZVA5Kmj

— Rep. Barry Loudermilk (@RepLoudermilk) November 8, 2024

DOJ Misconduct: "Extensive Evidence” of Wrongdoing

Kelly describes a litany of alleged misconduct, from evidence mishandling to intimidation of witnesses. She asserts there’s "extensive evidence” suggesting DOJ officials collaborated to undermine Trump. "There was communication, collaboration here. We say conspiracy,” Kelly stated, outlining how DOJ officials reportedly worked with National Archives staff and Biden administration figures, including White House counsel Jonathan Su.

Kelly argues that the DOJ initially tried to pursue a "destruction of documents” case against Trump but shifted to a "National Defense information” narrative after Trump’s team voluntarily handed over documents. This shift, she claims, indicates strategic targeting aimed at weakening Trump’s defense.

Allegations of Witness Tampering and Evidence Destruction

One of the most alarming claims Kelly brings up is potential witness tampering. She says DOJ prosecutors allegedly threatened Trump’s personal aide, Walt Nauta, in an effort to turn him into a government cooperator. This kind of "witness tampering,” as Kelly describes it, points to aggressive tactics that could cross legal boundaries.

Kelly also accuses prosecutors of mishandling and even possibly destroying evidence, leading to questions about the integrity of the DOJ’s case. "They’ve misled the court more than once,” she noted, referencing specific instances where attorney Jay Bratt was called out for falsehoods. She emphasizes that House Republicans have ample grounds to investigate, if they choose to.

House Republicans’ Next Move: "They Need to Pursue Criminal Charges”

Kelly believes this is a pivotal moment for House Republicans. She urges them to conduct a full investigation into the DOJ’s alleged misconduct. In her view, Jordan’s letter is a start, but she argues for further action, including "criminal charges” if the investigation uncovers sufficient evidence. "If they’re serious,” Kelly stated, "they need to pursue criminal charges against some special counsel and his prosecutors.” She names key DOJ officials, including Jay Bratt and David Harbach, who she claims are involved in unethical conduct.

Julie Kelly’s Continued Investigative Reporting

Kelly’s reporting on Jack Smith and the DOJ’s handling of Trump-related cases has intensified, bringing new insights into what she describes as a "weaponization” of federal power. She directs her audience to follow her latest updates on her Substack, Declassified with Julie Kelly, and RealClear Investigations. "I will have a lot more on this,” Kelly promised, signaling that further revelations are likely on the way. Her reports aim to advise Republicans in Congress on what to look for in future investigations.

Calls for DOJ Accountability Grow

With Jim Jordan’s letter and Kelly’s detailed reporting, scrutiny on the DOJ and Special Counsel Jack Smith continues to mount. Kelly’s comments underscore a growing demand for transparency and accountability within the highest levels of government. If these allegations hold, Kelly and Bannon argue, it could reshape public trust in the DOJ’s impartiality, especially in high-profile cases involving political figures.

For more information, watch: