Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots and a prominent figure in the America First movement, lauded the Georgia State Election Board’s new rule changes as crucial for ensuring election integrity. These changes, which address concerns about the certification process, have stirred debate but are hailed by Martin as a necessary step toward greater transparency.

“These government officials should encourage people to look at the elections; they should encourage these audits. They should want people to do this because it will bring confidence to our election system,” Martin said on Tuesday.

And Martin is including Democrats in that call to action.

Martin, who appeared on the Tuesday WarRoom, also took a few moments and criticized the prosecution of Mesa County, Colorado Recorder Tina Peters, calling what was happening a “disgrace.” Martin argues that Peters faced severe legal consequences not for altering election results or committing voter fraud but for conducting an audit and allowing an outside expert to review the election systems. Martin contends that Peters’ actions were aimed at increasing election transparency and confidence, a principle she believes should be encouraged by government officials rather than punished.

Martin asserts that the government’s reaction to Peters’ audit reflects a broader trend of suppressing scrutiny of election processes. She links this to a pattern of “Democrat lawfare” against those who challenge election integrity, mentioning past attempts to undermine Donald Trump through legal and political means.

According to Martin, the government’s harsh response to Peters illustrates a deeper issue of weaponization against individuals who seek to ensure election integrity. She sees this as part of a troubling trend where government agencies, like the IRS, have previously targeted individuals and organizations for their political views, a situation she believes has only worsened.

Martin concludes that election boards and officials should be able to scrutinize and question election results to maintain public trust, and she vows to support those who uphold the law amidst these challenges.

Martin explained that the Georgia rule changes aim to improve how election results are certified by allowing county election boards to address any issues before finalizing the certification. She recounted a troubling incident from the 2022 Democratic primary in DeKalb County, Georgia, where discrepancies in vote counts revealed errors. In this case, a candidate who initially appeared to have lost was later found to have won after a manual recount exposed flaws in the machine count.

“This case illustrates why it’s vital for election boards to have the ability to scrutinize results thoroughly before certification,” Martin asserted.

The new rules require that the total number of ballots scanned, issued, and counted match before precincts are closed. Martin described this requirement as “a common-sense measure” that ensures discrepancies are identified and addressed on-site rather than after results are certified. She emphasized the importance of this process: “If the numbers don’t reconcile, it’s crucial to address these issues immediately to maintain trust in the electoral system.”

Despite her support, Martin acknowledged that the rule changes have faced criticism, particularly from some liberal commentators and media outlets. Critics argue that these new measures could lead to unnecessary delays or be used to cast doubt on election results. However, Martin dismissed these concerns, arguing that the changes are designed to enhance, not undermine, confidence in the election process.

“The left’s complaints often miss the point,” she said. “These rules are about ensuring that every vote is accurately counted and that we have a system we can all trust.”

Martin also addressed concerns about the political dynamics in Georgia, where Republicans control the state government but face criticism from various quarters, including the America First movement. She clarified that the changes were not a partisan maneuver but a necessary adjustment to improve the election process.

“We need to evaluate each issue on its merits,” Martin noted. “While there are certainly political complexities, the goal here is to ensure that every voter, regardless of party affiliation, has confidence in the electoral system.”

The discussion also touched on broader implications for election integrity. Martin highlighted the need for all states to adopt similar measures to ensure transparency and accuracy. She cited Michigan as an example where officials have warned against the misuse of certification processes to challenge election results, reinforcing the need for clear, consistent rules across the board.

For more on Jenny Beth Martin, watch the full Tuesday segment:

Jenny Beth Martin Reveals The Election Fraud In DeKalb County’s 2022 Democratic Primary

In summary, Jenny Beth Martin’s defense of the new Georgia election rules reflects her commitment to upholding election integrity and transparency. Despite facing criticism, she remains steadfast in her belief that these changes are essential for maintaining public trust and ensuring a fair democratic process. As election-related controversies continue, Martin’s insights underscore the ongoing debate over how best to balance election integrity with practical administration.