Corporate media reported on Thursday that GOP firebrand representatives Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert attended Donald Trump’s trial in New York after attending a court hearing, reaffirming their support for the President.

“We are witnessing unprecedented actions of election interference emanating directly from the White House that are more akin to dictatorships. I’m proud to stand with President Trump in New York today and fight against this political persecution,” US Rep.Congressman Andy Ogles posted in reaction to the “firebrand protest’.

The MAGA firebrands joined other Republican allies, including Bob Good, Anna Paulina Luna, Mike Waltz, Andy Biggs, Diana Harshbarger, Eli Crane, Ralph Norman, Michael Cloud, and Andy Ogles, and others, totaling over 20 representatives, according to the New York Times.

"President Trump is not going anywhere,” said Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) as hecklers interrupted. "And we are not going anywhere either. We are here to stand with him.”

Trump faces allegations related to payments made to Stormy Daniels, with prosecutors claiming they were illegal attempts to conceal financial and election crimes. Trump denies the charges, labeling the trial as politically motivated. Their presence at the trial has sparked speculation about potential political alliances and future roles within the GOP.

Jeff Cark reported live to the WarRoom and slammed Michael Cohen, who had testified on Thursday:

WATCH: CRA Sr. Fellow @JeffClarkUS attends President Trump’s trial in NYC & says the Trump legal team is exposing Michael Cohen as a "serial liar.” pic.twitter.com/x3LahoaTSt

— Center for Renewing America (@amrenewctr) May 16, 2024

Gaetz and most members of the House Freedom Caucus were at the site of the trial to protest Trump’s treatment and to remind the public of a brazen conflict of interest with the judge in the trial.

We the People stand with @realDonaldTrump 🇺🇸👊🏻 pic.twitter.com/4qLCyKEA37

— Eli Crane for Congress (@EliCraneAZ) May 16, 2024

In the arena of law and justice, impartiality and the absence of bias are fundamental to upholding the integrity of the judicial process. However, recent developments surrounding the trial of President Donald Trump have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest. Specifically, concerns have emerged regarding the fundraising activities of the judge’s daughter, who presided over the case.

The alleged "crime" by President Trump is made up!

No other American in the country would be charged with this type of crime.

I watched Michael Cohen get dog walked through the series of lies he has told. There is literally no branch of government that he has not lied to. pic.twitter.com/Fi1GpbCF13

— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) May 16, 2024

The trial, which involves testimony from shady individuals such as Michael Cohen, a former attorney for Trump, has received considerable attention. While the legal drama unfolds, strong allegations have come to light about the daughter of the judge overseeing the proceedings being actively involved in fundraising efforts for the Democratic Party- using the trial of President Trump as political theater.

Critics argue that such a scenario presents a clear conflict of interest. Many Republicans believe that the judge’s impartiality may be compromised by familial ties to fundraising activities that could benefit one political party over another.

In the case of a trial involving a high-profile figure like Trump, whose political affiliations are well-known, any perceived bias could undermine the credibility of the judicial process and erode public trust in the outcome. It appears as if only Republicans care about those issues.

And what makes the optics of the day’s events even more remarkable is that the NYC ‘Firebrand protest’ comes as House Republicans who stayed in DC were focused on moving to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.

The House’s Oversight and Judiciary Committee Republicans are demanding the Justice Department turn over evidence in the classified documents case against Biden, including an audio interview that is potentially criminal for Biden. .

Both situation’s optics raise legitimate concerns about the potential for undue influence. Peter Navarro is serving a prison sentence for contempt of Congress charges, and Steve Bannon faces jail time.

Against the backdrop of fanatical yelling and screaming by Trump’s opponents, the Republicans continued on to make their case to the public, reminding the American people that numerous problems with the trial would likely lead them not to trust the situation.