Friday, July 19

Spiering Warns Of “Very Ugly” Situation If Harris Finds Out Democrats Are Attempting To Push Her Out

In the discussion between Ben Harnwell and Charlie Speirling on July 19, 2024, they analyze the Democratic Party’s prospects in light of President Joe Biden’s challenges and an attempted assassination on July 13, which they see as a pivotal moment in the campaign. Harnwell suggests that the Democrats may shift focus from winning the presidency to securing as many seats in Congress as possible, given Biden’s perceived inability to continue and Kamala Harris’ lack of readiness.

Speirling, a senior political correspondent for the Daily Mail and author on Kamala Harris, discusses her historical unpopularity and low approval ratings, noting her difficulties on the campaign trail. He explains that despite these issues, there is a growing push to elevate her as a potential presidential candidate due to the lack of other viable options and the party’s need to avoid alienating their base by bypassing her.

The conversation touches on Harris’ past mistakes and her efforts to support Biden, which have earned her some political capital. However, there is skepticism about her ability to command the respect of Democratic leaders like Nancy Pelosi. Both Harnwell and Speirling agree that Harris might be positioned as a “sacrificial goat” in a likely losing battle against Donald Trump, allowing the Democrats to preserve stronger candidates for future elections.

They also discuss the media’s potential role in rebranding Harris, her debating skills, and her ability to take on Republican opponents like JD Vance or Donald Trump. Despite her previous missteps, Harris’ experience as a prosecutor and her ability to deliver speeches and debates are seen as her strengths. The discussion concludes with an acknowledgment of the Democrats’ precarious position and the potential for Harris to emerge as a central figure despite the party’s internal conflicts and external challenges.

Rep. Bob Good: “I Have No Confidence In The Biden Administration Or This Director Cheatle”

In this discussion, Ben Harnwell and Bob Good talk about current political events, focusing on the impact of President Joe Biden’s administration and a recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Bob Good, Chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, emphasizes that Americans were better off under Trump’s presidency, citing economic prosperity, national security, and energy independence as key achievements. In contrast, he criticizes Biden’s policies, highlighting inflation, open borders, and diminished energy production.

They discuss the assassination attempt on Trump, expressing skepticism about the competence and intent of the shooter and questioning the effectiveness of the Secret Service’s response. Good criticizes the Secret Service Director for mishandling the situation and calls for accountability, suggesting that the director’s focus on diversity policies compromised agency effectiveness.

The conversation also touches on conspiracy theories, with Good and Harnwell speculating about possible involvement beyond the lone shooter, given the apparent lapses in security. They question the decision not to preemptively neutralize the threat and the implications of such security failures.

Good provides an update on his call for a recount in Virginia’s 5th District, explaining the process and its significance for national politics. He highlights the importance of ensuring the accuracy of the election results and the potential impact on future elections, including Trump’s prospects in Virginia. Good mentions the financial costs involved in pursuing a recount and expresses hope for a thorough and transparent process.

Mark Paoletta Demands Answer From USSS Director Cheatle

In a conversation between Ben Harnwell and Mark Paoletta, the discussion centered on recent political events, particularly the impact of an assassination attempt on President Trump on July 13th. Paoletta emphasized the significance of the event, noting Trump’s resilience and the subsequent exposure of Democratic and media narratives. He criticized the Secret Service for their failures and expressed frustration with the lack of transparency and accountability from the Biden administration. Paoletta argued that the administration’s actions have been obstructive, particularly regarding congressional subpoenas and oversight.

The conversation highlighted the necessity for a thorough investigation into the assassination attempt and the Secret Service’s handling of the situation. Paoletta called for accountability and criticized Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas for allegedly preventing the Secret Service director from testifying. He asserted that only the President has the authority to block such testimony.

Looking ahead, Paoletta suggested that a Republican victory in future elections would facilitate greater transparency and accountability, allowing for more effective congressional oversight. He expressed optimism that a Trump-led Department of Justice would vigorously enforce subpoenas and pursue investigations with the same zeal as seen in recent Democratic-led inquiries.

The discussion concluded with Harnwell and Paoletta agreeing on the importance of Republican leadership for ensuring truth and justice in government operations.

Petr Bystron Exposes German Police’s Harassment Of Himself And Family For Rightwing Beliefs

In a conversation between Petr Bystron, a German MP from the Alternative for Deutschland (AfD), and Ben Harnwell, Bystron recounted the repeated intrusions by German security services into his home—19 times in total. Bystron described these actions as pure intimidation, emphasizing that the searches even extended to his mother’s hospital room. He likened this harassment to tactics used against political opponents in other countries, including the U.S., drawing parallels between German and American political repression.

Bystron highlighted the severe measures, including armed special forces conducting early morning raids, which he likened to terrorizing tactics. He argued that such actions mirror historical totalitarianism and are not just targeted at him but at broader opposition movements. Bystron pointed out that similar repression is seen in other European countries and the U.S., with leaders and media critical of globalist agendas facing similar threats.

He criticized mainstream media for misrepresenting political opposition as extremist, while actually, he claims, it’s the left that mirrors totalitarian tactics. Bystron also discussed his concerns for Donald Trump, suggesting that the real threat lies in potential manipulations by the Democrats rather than direct physical threats.

Fantini Explains How The EU Re-Elected Leftwing Leader In Secret Vote After Rightwing Movements Grew

In a recent discussion between Ben Harnwell and Ellen Krieger Fantini from the European Conservative, the focus was on Ursula von der Leyen’s re-election as President of the European Commission. Fantini criticized von der Leyen for securing her second mandate by aligning with the left, despite the European Parliament’s recent shift to the right. She accused von der Leyen of making deals with the radical greens and centrist factions to retain her position, while disregarding the views of a significant portion of European voters who supported right-wing and nationalist parties.

Fantini highlighted that von der Leyen’s re-election did not reflect a direct democratic choice from European citizens, as she was elected in a secret vote that involved strategic maneuvering rather than a clear public mandate. This alignment with the left, she argued, deepens the divide between Brussels and the electorate, particularly those who supported nationalist and sovereigntist movements. The discussion exposes the frustration among these right-wing groups, noting that von der Leyen’s approach to policy, including the Green Deal and migration pacts, further alienates the European voters who seek change. This, Fantini suggested, reflects a broader trend of disenfranchisement and dissatisfaction with the current EU leadership.