President Trump has authorized the deployment of B-2 stealth bombers toward Guam amid rising tensions with Iran, signaling a serious escalation in military preparedness. Jack Posobiec reported on WarRoom that these bombers, potentially carrying bunker-busting payloads, are within refueling reach of Iran. The move coincides with increasing speculation that Israel’s recent preemptive strike—possibly driven by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s domestic political struggles—was timed to trigger U.S. involvement. While Trump has not ordered a strike, all signs suggest that pressure is mounting. Intelligence assessments remain conflicting, raising public concerns about unclear motives and the risk of war.

Posobiec highlighted a significant shift in U.S. military posture: President Trump has authorized the movement of B-2 Spirit stealth bombers toward Guam. These aircraft, capable of carrying massive bunker-busting ordnance, appear to be flying heavy and accompanied by refueling tankers, positioning them within striking distance of Iranian targets. While not as close as Diego Garcia or Gulf airbases like those in Qatar or Saudi Arabia, the current setup allows for flexibility and rapid escalation, if ordered.

This development follows Israel’s recent stealth attack on Iranian military targets. According to Posobiec and reporting from Mark Caputo, the urgency of Israel’s strike was driven by a perceived closing window: Iran’s proxy forces had been degraded, its missile program was accelerating, and reports—though conflicting—suggest its nuclear capabilities were nearing a dangerous threshold.

However, Posobiec raised a key question: was Israel’s timing driven solely by security concerns, or was Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also motivated by political survival? Just before launching strikes, Netanyahu barely held onto power amid a brewing rebellion within his coalition. His political standing has been weakened by ongoing tensions in Gaza and disputes with Ultra-Orthodox parties over military conscription. Some Israeli intelligence voices are reportedly uneasy, wondering if national security justifications were used to mask personal political gain.

President Trump, for his part, has not yet committed to direct military action. Caputo noted that Trump is weighing options—under immense pressure from both the intelligence community and allies like Israel—while still leaving room for negotiation. Though some U.S. officials have stated regime change is not the goal, Israel’s objective reportedly includes decapitation strikes against Iran’s military leadership and possibly more.

Posobiec emphasized the mixed messaging from intelligence sources: timelines for Iran’s nuclear capability vary wildly—from days, to months, to over a year. This inconsistency has fed public skepticism, especially given the rapid pace of events and the historical consequences of poorly understood intelligence (e.g., Iraq 2003). Still, according to some assessments, Iran’s missile and enrichment programs have already been set back 2–3 years by Israeli action.

In the closing remarks, Posobiec called for an open, adult discussion about why the U.S. appears to be on the brink of war and whether Americans have been given a clear, fact-based justification. As it stands, the pieces are on the board: the bombers are moving, allies are acting, and the decision remains in the hands of President Trump—who, according to Caputo, is caught between his instinct for diplomacy and mounting pressure to act decisively.

For more details, watch these segments:

CAPUTO: Iran’s Missile Program Was Starting To Progress A Lot Faster Than Is Comfortable For Israel

LATEST: President Trump Has Deployed B-2 Stealth Bombers, Jack Posobiec Reports