No Result
View All Result
Sunday, February 15, 2026
Stephen K Bannon's WarRoom
  • Show Episodes
    • Full Episodes
    • Podcast Audio
    • Transcripts
    • Content Feed
  • Topics
    • Politics & Elections
    • Economy & Finance
    • Border & National Security
    • Big Tech & AI
    • CCP & Geopolitics
    • Faith & Religion
  • Events
    • Photo Gallery
    • Speeches
  • Sponsors
    • Shop WarRoom Merch
    • SacredHuman Health
    • WarPath Coffee
    • MyPillow
    • Meriwether Farms
    • Rebels, Rogues, and Outlaws
    • DARK ÆON
    • All Sponsors
  • Get Active!
    • BillBlaster App
    • Forums
  • Contact Us
  • SIGN UP
  • Show Episodes
    • Full Episodes
    • Podcast Audio
    • Transcripts
    • Content Feed
  • Topics
    • Politics & Elections
    • Economy & Finance
    • Border & National Security
    • Big Tech & AI
    • CCP & Geopolitics
    • Faith & Religion
  • Events
    • Photo Gallery
    • Speeches
  • Sponsors
    • Shop WarRoom Merch
    • SacredHuman Health
    • WarPath Coffee
    • MyPillow
    • Meriwether Farms
    • Rebels, Rogues, and Outlaws
    • DARK ÆON
    • All Sponsors
  • Get Active!
    • BillBlaster App
    • Forums
  • Contact Us
  • SIGN UP
No Result
View All Result
Stephen K Bannon's WarRoom
No Result
View All Result

United Nations Planning To Criminalize Spreading 'Misinformation' That Causes 'Social Disorder' & 'Hatred.'

By: Natalie Winters / WarRoom.org

War Room Staff by War Room Staff
January 26, 2023
in Big Tech & AI, Highlight, Newsroom
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Home Big Tech & AI

The United Nations has launched a new initiative to "counter the use of information and communications technologies" for "criminal purposes," which appears to apply to individuals who share "misinformation."

Private companies, including social media platforms such as Facebook’s parent company Meta, are also involved in the venture.

Draft versions of the convention reveal that the UN may criminalize posts that promote "hatred" – including "ideological" and "political" – in addition to the vague term "extremism." The Chinese Communist Party has also submitted proposals to criminalize sharing information that results in "social disorder."

The effort began in December 2019, when the United Nations (UN) General Assembly adopted a resolution calling for the formulation of a Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communications Technologies for Criminal Purposes. Currently, an Ad Hoc committee is working on details â€" including member states, jurisdiction, and focus areas â€" for the convention, which will be formalized in September 2024.

While current UN conventions broadly address information and communications technologies, the pending convention will be the first to focus on these methods of communication in the context of “criminal purposes.”

What exactly constitutes “criminal purposes,” however, remains vague, and from the available information about the convention, the term appears to include individuals who spread “misinformation.”

The most recent draft of the convention’s objectives and scope explains how the UN is working with countries to “promote, facilitate and strengthen international cooperation in preventing and combating the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes,” which includes compelling countries to adopt “legislative and other measures as are necessary to establish” certain online behaviors as “offence under domestic law.”

Put simply, the UN could potentially override the sovereignty of countries by pushing governments to adopt specific policies about what constitutes "criminal" information shared by citizens.

Article 26, for example, of the draft document calls on countries to adopte "legislative and other measures" to criminalize individuals who engage in sharing content that promotes “subversive or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State.”

Similarly vague, Article 27 focuses on “extremism-related offences,” which it defines as “the distribution of materials that call for illegal acts motivated by political, ideological, social, racial, ethnic or religious hatred, the advocacy and justification of such acts.”

At face value, the forms of speech the UN is trying to curtail may seem justified, but the broad scope of what constitutes "subversive" posts or the promotion of "political" or "ideological hatred" could easily be used to target content critical of the far-left, globalist agenda of groups like the UN and World Economic Forum (WEF).

For example, Article 29 of the draft document focuses on “terrorism-related offences,” calling on countries to criminalize commissioning, inciting, or recruiting terrorism, which it defines as “spreading of strife, sedition, hatred or racism.”

The Ad Hoc Committee responsible for formulating the details of the convention features representatives from the private sector, too.

Participants include Amazon Web Services, Inc., the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Facebook's parent company Meta, and Microsoft.

Chinese Communist Party-run entities including the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies and Beijing Normal University have also been involved in deliberations.

INTERPOL has also participated in a discussion about the purview of the convention, alleging that the "prominent threats" the body must face include "misinformation."

The Chinese Communist Party is also trying to influence the outcome of the convention, adding a proposal that would criminalize spreading information "that could result in serious social disorder."

In full, the proposal reads:

"Each State Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as criminal offenses, when committed intentionally and unlawfully, the publishing, distributing, transmitting, or otherwise making available of false information that could result in serious social disorder, including but not limited to information related to natural and human-caused disasters, by means of [a computer system] [an information and communications technology system/device];"

Previous Post

Jim Hoft Analyzes Footage of Ray Epps Active in Capitol Riot on Jan. 6, 2021

Next Post

Episode 2470: The Debate From Dana Point; Joe Kent Live

Related Posts

Big Tech & AI

The AMERICA Act: Erecting Blast Shields Against the AI Time Bomb

December 22, 2025
AI data centers replacing municipal golf courses and green space
Artificial Intelligence

Data Centers Are Devouring Public Land

December 13, 2025
AI Power Worker Control explained by Steve Bannon and Joe Allen
Artificial Intelligence

AI Power Worker Control: Steve Bannon and Joe Allen Expose the AI Agenda

December 13, 2025
Steve Bannon interviews Brendan Steinhauser on WarRoom about AI executive order and state laws
Artificial Intelligence

AI Executive Order Fight Escalates as States Refuse Federal Overreach

December 12, 2025
Next Post

Episode 2470: The Debate From Dana Point; Joe Kent Live

  • Show Episodes
  • Topics
  • Events
  • Sponsors
  • Get Active!
  • Contact Us
  • SIGN UP

© 2025 WarRoom

No Result
View All Result
  • Show Episodes
    • Full Episodes
    • Podcast Audio
    • Transcripts
    • Content Feed
  • Topics
    • Politics & Elections
    • Economy & Finance
    • Border & National Security
    • Big Tech & AI
    • CCP & Geopolitics
    • Faith & Religion
  • Events
    • Photo Gallery
    • Speeches
  • Sponsors
    • Shop WarRoom Merch
    • SacredHuman Health
    • WarPath Coffee
    • MyPillow
    • Meriwether Farms
    • Rebels, Rogues, and Outlaws
    • DARK ÆON
    • All Sponsors
  • Get Active!
    • BillBlaster App
    • Forums
  • Contact Us
  • SIGN UP

© 2025 WarRoom