Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec sharply criticized Mark Levin for undermining President Trump’s peace posture toward Iran, accusing Levin of backhandedly aligning with neocon warmongers like Lindsey Graham. They framed Levin’s comments as a subtle attack on Trump’s restraint and diplomacy, rejecting his aggressive rhetoric as out of touch with the MAGA movement and the America First doctrine.

In a fiery WarRoom segment, Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec turned their sights on Mark Levin, calling him out for what they saw as a veiled attack on President Trump’s diplomatic posture amid rising tensions with Iran. The conflict centered on a Fox News clip in which Levin defended the use of military power—if wielded by a “smart Commander-in-Chief”—while claiming that Trump’s strength had stopped Iran’s nuclear ambitions and granted Americans the luxury of sleeping peacefully.

While the opening sounded like praise, Bannon and Posobiec saw something different. They interpreted Levin’s subsequent social media post as a passive-aggressive jab at Trump’s statement urging de-escalation and peace between Israel and Iran. Levin warned against giving Iran a “lifeline” or “off-ramp” to survive and rearm, clearly objecting to Trump’s call for diplomacy. Bannon branded this as a “subtweet,” implying Levin was indirectly accusing Trump of weakness.

Bannon didn’t hold back. He noted the irony in Levin’s logic: praising Trump’s past military actions while simultaneously criticizing his current strategy of restraint. "President Trump has made it clear—no more endless wars, no more regime change,” Bannon said. "Levin’s still selling neocon fear porn.” Bannon highlighted that the MAGA movement has outgrown the Bush-era interventionism that voices like Levin and Graham continue to echo.

Jack Posobiec piled on, drawing a sharp line between America First realism and outdated neocon idealism. He reminded viewers of past U.S. foreign policy failures, like Iraq, which were sold to the public on promises of peace and democracy but ended in chaos and bloodshed. "This is the same script,” Posobiec said. "Levin’s just reading it with a different voice.”

They also called out Levin’s inconsistency—praising Trump as deserving "ten Nobel Peace Prizes” while simultaneously implying he’s enabling Iran by urging peace. "Mark, write this down next time you talk to Bibi,” Bannon snapped. "President Trump didn’t offer a lifeline—he said finish what you started.”

The tension revealed a growing split between establishment conservative voices like Levin and the populist-nationalist base Trump represents. While Levin paints diplomacy as appeasement, Bannon and Posobiec insisted Trump’s strategy is one of strength through sovereignty—backing allies like Israel while refusing to let American sons and daughters be sacrificed for more failed regime change campaigns.

They ended the segment reinforcing that Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, has obliterated Iran’s nuclear ambitions through targeted, effective action—and now seeks a peaceful path forward. Anything less than full-throated support for that vision, they implied, was political sabotage dressed up as patriotism.

Bannon and Posobiec didn’t just disagree with Levin—they exposed what they saw as a betrayal of Trump’s leadership and the MAGA foreign policy agenda. In their eyes, Levin’s veiled critique aligned more with Beltway warmongers than with the America First movement he once praised.

Watch the full segment: